Skip to main content
CCEnergy industriesColombiaACM0002

Sogamoso Hydroelectric Project

ECO-188 ↗

#1278of 1935 in Renewable energy#76of 124 in Colombia#57of 99 in CerCarbono (CC)#994of 1287 in ACM0002

4.8/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
3.5

Audit Analysis

The Sogamoso Hydroelectric Project is a small-scale renewable energy avoidance project with a verified investment additionality test and jurisdictional baseline, but its credibility is significantly undermined by eleven material findings (including missing financial additionality evidence and PDD–monitoring report inconsistencies), six cross-document contradictions, and a low extraction confidence rating. The project delivered only about 64% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the first monitoring year, which is conservative, but the 0% leakage deduction rests on a contradictory justification within the same verification report.

Red Flags

  • Eleven material findings in the verification report, including omission of financial additionality assessment and baseline scenario justification, and inconsistencies between PDD and monitoring report measurement methods
  • Internal contradiction within the verification report: leakage justification stated as both 'quantified' and 'deemed negligible' in the same document
  • Baseline method contradicted across documents: verification report (2025) says jurisdictional, validation report (2024) says project-specific
  • Grid emission factor differs between the PDD (0.223) and the verification report (0.1843, 2023), with no documented reconciliation
  • Low extraction confidence across the document set, with one document of unknown type, reducing reliability of the extracted record

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2023
443,032375442,657
2024
279,2490279,249
Total722,281375721,906

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-verified but contradicted and missing financial evidence

Permanence

Hydro avoidance project, no inherent reversal risk

Leakage

0% deduction with contradictory justification

Baseline

Jurisdictional per VVB but contradicted by validation report

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, and safeguards documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents