CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredVCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)IndiaRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Solar Energy Project(s) by SB Energy Private Limited

Developer: Adani Renewable Energy Devco Private Limited

VCS-1805 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#135of 5087 in Renewable energy#80of 2807 in India#185of 1608 in Verra (VCS)#129of 3484 in ACM0002

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 7.2 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-16medium confidenceLatest verified period ends: 2023-08-31

evidence: 25/35 registry documents read · 0 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

Solar Energy Project(s) by SB Energy Private Limited (India) generates grid-connected renewable electricity (solar, 2250 MW) under ACM0002 version 19; registry status Registered (VCS), 9,446,114 credits issued (vintages 2017–2023). The documents name VKU Certification Pvt. Ltd as validation / verification body. The documents estimate 4,354,646 tCO2e per year. The latest verification report (2023-02-01 – 2023-08-31) verifies 1,393,764 tCO2e. The latest monitoring report read is of an earlier period (01-July-2022 – 31-January-2023) and reports 1,115,742 tCO2e achieved. The latest monitoring period achieved 43% of its ex-ante estimate (per the monitoring report).

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 35 registry documents (25 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-25

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2017
521,071519,8241,247
2018
810,552801,3859,167
2019
626,090626,0900
2020
1,519,5581,519,5580
2021
1,877,3531,827,35350,000
2022
2,514,5941,336,6121,177,982
2023
1,576,8965,3291,571,567
Total9,446,1146,636,1512,809,963

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2017–2018ACM0002 v19.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2019–2020ACM0002 v19.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2020–2021ACM0002 v19.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2021–2022ACM0002 v19.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2022–2023ACM0002 v19.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2023ACM0002 v19.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+109)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002 version 19
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →