CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredVCSavoidanceCanadaVintage 2013, 2014, 2015Registry: RegisteredVM0018

Sustainable Community

Developer: WILL Solutions Inc

VCS-929 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#23of 44 in Canada#435of 524 in Verra (VCS)

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 3.9 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-09-10medium confidence

evidence:64/64registry documents analyzed · 5red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

This large Quebec waste-diversion and energy-efficiency project (84 facilities, 820 PAIs) has VVB-confirmed additionality and no permanence risk, but is undermined by an extraordinary volume of material findings, a confirmed double-counting issue with Quebec's cap-and-trade system (14,688 tCO2e), deviations from the PDD methodology, and only 17% delivery against the pro-rata ex-ante expectation. The project is under-crediting rather than over-crediting, but the data quality and compliance record raise serious concerns about the robustness of the underlying claims.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 64 registry documents (64 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: methodology

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2010
21,96217,9624,000
2011
23,05113,5519,500
2012
20,4345,10015,334
2013
47,93234,06613,866
2014
143,202136,5526,650
2015
64,99660,4154,581
2016
372,993271,947101,046
2017
233,050132,425100,625
2018
263,610160,463103,147
2019
75,00046,68328,317
2020
83,00056,59426,406
2021
143,231119,15324,078
2022
85,00043,61241,388
2023
42,00064241,358
2024
25,00056624,434
Total1,644,4611,099,731544,730

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+29)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

Marketplaces

Carbonmarksold out

~1.26/tCO2

Vintage 2013, 2014, 2015

↗
+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceVM0018
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →