Utsil Naj - healthy homes for all in Mexico
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified Additionality was confirmed by the VVB in the verification report, and the project reports no reversal events.
missing The verification report lists a material finding, and the record does not state any buffer pool allocation.
Transparency
verified The monitoring period, verified emission reductions, and usage monitoring approach are stated in the official records.
missing Several key items are inconsistent across documents, including usage monitoring, leakage treatment, and the project timeline.
Claim Safety
verified The project is not CORSIA-eligible, which reduces dual-market claim risk.
missing The project-specific baseline and a zero leakage deduction with changing leakage descriptions leave some over-crediting risk.
Documentation
verified Multiple official documents were used, including validation, monitoring, and verification records, with medium extraction confidence.
missing One key document was not clearly readable, and the record contains contradictions on several core safeguards and accounting items.
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The verification report confirms additionality was checked by Earthood Services Private Limited, and it reports no reversal events. The project uses a project baseline, but the baseline was not shown as recently reassessed, and no buffer pool percentage is stated in the extracted record. A material finding labeled CL 3 appears in the verification report, which slightly weakens confidence in the robustness of the accounting.
Transparency
The record provides a monitoring period from 2019-04-01 to 2023-03-13, verified emission reductions of 89,931, and an annual survey approach for usage monitoring. However, the documents conflict on the monitoring approach, with one record indicating self-reporting, and the crediting period also appears inconsistent across documents. These inconsistencies reduce transparency even though the core MRV figures are present.
Claim Safety
Claim safety is moderate because the project is not CORSIA-eligible and leakage is described as negligible with a 0% deduction in the verification report. Still, the record shows a contradiction where an earlier verification report reportedly quantified leakage, while the later report treats it as negligible, and the baseline is project-specific rather than a more conservative standardized approach. The verified usage rate of about 88.8% is close to the assumed 90%, which is reassuring but not enough to offset the documentation inconsistencies.
Documentation
Documentation is reasonably complete, with validation, monitoring, verification, and PDD materials listed among the evidence used. The extraction confidence is medium rather than high, and one key document was poorly readable, which limits certainty. The record also contains contradictions on FPIC, grievance mechanisms, safeguards, leakage, usage monitoring, and the crediting period, so the documentation quality is adequate but not strong.
Overall
I privileged the later and more specific verification report for items such as additionality, leakage treatment, safeguards, and verified emissions because it is the most direct post-issuance source, while noting that the validation report and older monitoring records conflict on several points. The contradictions on FPIC, grievance mechanism, leakage justification, usage monitoring, and crediting period materially reduce reliability, so the score is kept moderate rather than high. Under the deterministic rules, the integrity score remains above 4.0, so no overall cap is triggered, but the mixed documentation and unresolved discrepancies prevent a stronger result.
Audit Analysis
This is a Gold Standard cookstove project with VVB-confirmed additionality, a project baseline, and no reported reversals, which supports moderate integrity. However, the record shows several contradictions across documents, a material finding in verification, and some important safeguards and leakage details are either mixed or only partially documented.
Project Description
The Challenge: Climate Resilience in Rural Mexico Mexico continues to face the intensifying effects of climate change. Increasingly volatile weather patterns and extreme events are disrupting agricultural yields, directly threatening the food security and livelihoods of the nation’s most vulnerable rural populations. The solution: Utsil Naj “Healthy Homes for All” Utsil Naj is a high-impact, large-scale intervention program designed to transform living conditions across Central America. Meaning "Healthy Homes for all" in Mayan, the program deploys sustainable technologies that deliver immediate social and environmental benefits to rural households. Currently operating in Mexico and other countries in Central America, Utsil Naj bridges the gap between grassroots community needs and global climate goals. Strategic Impact and Scalability Through localized partnerships and deep-rooted community trust, Utsil Naj Mexico has achieved significant milestones: Scale: Over 17,000 improved cookstoves monitored, benefiting more than 83,000 people living in poverty. Health: Users report that respiratory illnesses have significantly decreased since adopting improved cookstoves, reflecting a substantial reduction in indoor air pollution and associated health risks. Environment: The project in Mexico has prevented over 251,000 tCO2e from entering the atmosphere and saves nearly 174,000 tons of wood , actively combatting local deforestation. Social Business Model and Vision Microsol operates as a social enterprise, reinvesting 100% of its revenue from certified carbon credit sales (Gold Standard) back into project maintenance and expansion. As Mexico moves toward, Utsil Naj stands as a premier example of high-integrity carbon offsetting. The Project collaborates with international organizations and local governments to define scalable roadmaps, ensuring that climate action is inclusive, culturally respectful, and scientifically rigorous.
Red Flags
- The documents conflict on FPIC, grievance mechanism, safeguards, leakage treatment, usage monitoring, and crediting period, which weakens reliability.
- The verification report records a material finding and the project has no buffer pool information, so permanence and documentation confidence are not fully robust.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 285 | 285 | 0 | |
| 2012 | 25,053 | 25,053 | 0 | |
| 2013 | 29,839 | 29,839 | 0 | |
| 2014 | 29,402 | 29,402 | 0 | |
| 2015 | 24,481 | 24,481 | 0 | |
| 2016 | 25,166 | 25,166 | 0 | |
| 2017 | 22,135 | 22,135 | 0 | |
| 2018 | 16,359 | 14,835 | 1,524 | |
| 2020 | 19,841 | 5,481 | 14,360 | |
| 2021 | 24,415 | 488 | 23,927 | |
| 2022 | 27,092 | 541 | 26,551 | |
| 2023 | 7,058 | 141 | 6,917 | |
| Total | 251,126 | 177,847 | 73,279 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Publish a clean, reconciled document set that resolves the contradictions on FPIC, grievance mechanism, leakage treatment, usage monitoring, and crediting period.
- Provide clearer evidence on baseline reassessment, buffer pool treatment, and the full rationale for the material finding and its closure.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed additionality
No reversals reported
Negligible leakage claimed
Project baseline, reassessment unclear
Safeguards partly documented
Not CORSIA-eligible; CCP status unstated
Where to buy
Marketplaces
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Registry Documents
monitoring
- GS1377_T-PerfCert_v3.0-Project-Annual-Report 2024.pdf
- Monitoring Report_2nd monitoring period_01-01-2015 to 31-08-2018_v5.pdf
- UN VPA4 SDG Summary v2.xlsx
- Monitoring Report_1st monitoring period_27-12-2011 to 31-12-2014_v8.pdf
- UN VPA4 FPP Onil ER Calculations MP1 of CP2 v5 - Public Document.xlsx
- 5. ER Estimations CP2 - GIRA Patsari v2 - Public document.xlsx
- +9 more
Other
pdd
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →