Vai al contenuto principale
VCS avoidance India Registry: Registered Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

Vishnuprayag Hydro-Electric Project (Vhep) By Jaiprakash Power Ventures Ltd.(Jpvl)

VCS-173 ↗

4.0 / 10
Integrity
4.6
Transparency
3.8
Claim Safety
3.9
Documentation
3.2

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified Additionality was confirmed by the VVB using an investment test, and the verification report reports no material findings.

missing Leakage is not addressed, reversal treatment is not stated, and no buffer pool percentage is available.

Transparency

verified The project has a named VVB and a defined monitoring period from 2013-01-01 to 2016-06-02.

missing The extracted record has low extraction confidence, only one evidence document is identified, and key monitoring details such as the usage monitoring method are not stated.

Claim Safety

verified The project is marked as not CORSIA-eligible, which reduces dual-market claim risk.

missing The baseline is project-specific rather than clearly standardized or recently reassessed, and the issuance figures contain major contradictions across documents.

Documentation

verified The record includes a substantial number of extracted facts and the issuance document is dated 2021-05-27, which is relatively recent.

missing Low extraction confidence and multiple contradictions across documents reduce trust in the completeness and consistency of the documentation.

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The project has some positive integrity signals: the VVB confirmed additionality through an investment test, and the verification report reports no material findings or corrective actions. However, leakage is explicitly not addressed, reversal events are not addressed, and there is no buffer pool information, which weakens permanence and leakage robustness.

Transparency

Transparency is limited by missing monitoring detail and weak document readability. The record names the VVB and provides a monitoring period, but the usage monitoring method is not stated and the extraction confidence is low, so the evidence base is incomplete.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is constrained by the project-specific baseline approach and major inconsistencies in issuance totals. The project is marked as not CORSIA-eligible, which helps, but the contradictory claimed and verified issuance figures create over-crediting and reliability concerns that lower confidence in the credits.

Documentation

The documentation set appears broad, with many extracted fields and a recent issuance document dated 2021-05-27. Still, the extraction confidence is low and several key items are missing or inconsistent, including leakage treatment, reversal handling, and the usage monitoring method.

Overall

I privileged the more recent issuance-era values where the record appears to reflect the final issuance package, but the contradictions materially reduce confidence. In particular, I treated the 2021-era entries as higher priority than older records for safeguards and benefit sharing, while noting that the issuance totals conflict sharply between documents and therefore warrant a downward reliability adjustment. Because the project is a hydro avoidance project with no reversal event reported but also no buffer pool or leakage treatment clearly documented, the overall profile is mixed rather than strong.

Audit Analysis

This is a registered VCS hydro project with VVB-confirmed additionality and no material findings reported, but the evidence set has major reliability issues. The record shows large contradictions in issuance totals and several safeguards/leakage fields are either inconsistent or not addressed, which weakens confidence in the claimed credits.

Project Description

The Vishnuprayag Hydroelectric Project (VHEP) was a run-of-the-river project in India that created 400 MW of energy. It was implemented by Jaiprakash Power Ventures Ltd. (JPVL), a subsidiary of Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL).

Red Flags

  • The issuance totals conflict sharply across documents, with one record showing 196,922 claimed versus 2,889,200 verified, indicating serious data reliability concerns.
  • Leakage is marked as not addressed, and there is no buffer pool or reversal treatment stated in the extracted record.

Credit Vintages

Issued Retired Available
2006
608,076 406,306 201,770
2007
1,504,596 1,301,257 203,339
2008
1,212,189 1,212,189 0
2009
1,220,334 1,145,306 75,028
2010
1,497,064 1,497,064 0
2011
1,608,914 1,608,914 0
2012
1,303,511 1,303,511 0
2013
408,010 343,800 64,210
2014
1,222,754 1,128,046 94,708
2015
927,106 663,739 263,367
2016
331,330 283,863 47,467
Total 11,843,884 10,893,995 949,889

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Provide a reconciled issuance table explaining the conflicting claimed and verified credit totals across documents.
  • Publish explicit leakage and reversal treatment, including any buffer pool allocation and the monitoring method for usage or displacement effects.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

No buffer pool or reversal treatment stated

Leakage

Leakage not addressed

Baseline

Project baseline, reassessment not stated

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance mechanism documented

Double-claim

Not CORSIA-eligible; CCP status not stated

Where to buy

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-18 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti