Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticUgandaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

VPA - Spouts - 2

GS-1119 ↗ · current registry ID: GS6444

#993of 1329 in Industrial#125of 163 in Uganda#1424of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.4/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

This Gold Standard energy-efficiency project in Uganda (displacing decentralized thermal energy) shows a moderate level of rigor but suffers from several evidence gaps: no VVB is named, no verified ERR figure is available, and the additionality rests on the weakest test type (common practice) without independent verification. A contradiction in claimed ERR between two monitoring reports (8,528 vs 18,614 tCO₂e) and a shift in the stated monitoring method from self-report to annual survey introduce data-reliability concerns that temper confidence in the credit volume.

Red Flags

  • Claimed ERR differs by more than 2× between two monitoring reports (18,614 in April 2020 vs 8,528 in October 2020); the basis for the revision is not explained in the extracted record.
  • Additionality relies solely on a common-practice test with no VVB confirmation recorded; this is the weakest additionality pathway under Gold Standard.
  • No verification body name appears in any extracted document, making independent oversight unverifiable.
  • Leakage is described as 'quantified' in the justification field, yet no actual deduction percentage is present in the record.

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2017
2,1192,1190
2018
9,7289,7280
2019
9,6109,6100
2020
5,6855,6850
Total27,14227,1420

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Common-practice test only, no VVB confirmation

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

Described as quantified but no value in record

Baseline

Project-specific, no reassessment date

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism and benefit sharing present, FPIC not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-07General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents