Wind Power Project in Tinwari, Rajasthan

Integrity

The verification report from Earthood Services Private Limited confirms additionality using an investment test, which supports the project’s core integrity case. However, the latest record does not address leakage justification, buffer pool coverage is not stated, and reversal handling is described only as not addressed, which weakens permanence and leakage confidence. The report also lists multiple corrective actions and closed findings, suggesting the monitoring evidence required several rounds of correction before acceptance.

Transparency

Transparency is moderate because the verification report provides a monitoring period and a verified emissions figure of 36,189, but the claimed amount is not found in the extracted record. Key MRV details such as usage monitoring method, baseline reassessment timing, and several grid-factor inputs are missing, which limits public traceability. The medium extraction confidence also suggests at least one source was not fully readable.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is helped by the use of ACM0002 for a wind project and by VVB-confirmed additionality, both of which reduce baseline manipulation risk. Still, the latest verification record does not clearly justify leakage treatment, and the contradiction notes that an earlier document reportedly quantified leakage while the newer record says it is not addressed. CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated, so dual-market claim risk cannot be ruled out from the extracted record.

Documentation

Documentation quality is fair but not strong: the record includes a recent verification report dated 2023-11-07 and 18 documents were used. At the same time, the extraction confidence is medium, and the report contains several corrective actions and clarifications, indicating the file set was not cleanly complete. The crediting period also appears in conflicting forms across documents, which further reduces documentation reliability.

Overall

I privileged the most recent verification report dated 2023-11-07 for items where the record conflicts, because it is the latest and most specific source in the extracted set. That means I treated safeguards as mentioned, reversal handling as not addressed, leakage justification as not addressed, and the crediting period as 2016-03-19 to 2022-07-31, while noting that an earlier document reportedly showed different values. These contradictions reduce reliability and keep the score below what the project’s VVB-confirmed additionality alone might suggest. The overall score is also constrained by missing MRV detail and the absence of stated CORSIA/CCP status.