Skip to main content
GSBiogas - ElectricityChinaAMS-III.G

Xinyang MSW Landfill Site LFG Recovery to Power Project

GS-160 ↗ · current registry ID: GS1253

#21of 268 in Biogas#238of 1084 in China#260of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#6of 34 in AMS-III.G

5.8/ 10
Integrity
6.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
6.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

A Gold Standard landfill gas-to-power project in China with VVB-confirmed additionality and a measured project-specific baseline, but hampered by numerous clerical and data-quality findings across its monitoring and verification reports, a low extraction confidence rating, and several inter-document contradictions that reduce confidence in the underlying data. The project delivered roughly 81% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the most recent monitoring period, and the absence of CORSIA/CCP status information leaves dual-channel risk unassessed.

Red Flags

  • The PDD (2013) states landfill gas capture was legally required, while the 2020 monitoring report states it was not — this contradiction, if unresolved, could undermine the additionality claim.
  • The monitoring report initially stated a 100% LFG usage rate, which was later corrected to 96.47%, indicating a material data-quality error in the primary MRV record.
  • Twelve corrective actions were required by the VVB, including clarification of why zero project emissions and zero leakage were reported, suggesting the MRV narrative was not fully self-consistent.
  • Minimum extraction confidence is rated low, meaning at least one key document was poorly readable, reducing reliability of the extracted record.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2011
16,71516,70114
2012
30,78430,7840
2013
11,49111,4910
2015
36,09636,0960
2016
50,15450,1540
2017
45,12045,1200
2018
36,47636,4760
2019
34,40634,4060
2020
32,68332,6830
2021
2,6702,6700
Total296,595296,58114

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed but capture-requirement contradiction unresolved

Permanence

Biogas project — no carbon-stock reversal risk; operational since 2010

Leakage

0% deduction with quantified justification; 2020 VR had listed it as not addressed

Baseline

Project-specific measured baseline; reassessment timing not stated

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned and grievance mechanism present; FPIC not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both unrecorded — dual-channel risk unassessed

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-10AMS-III.G; AMS-I.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents