Top AMS-III.G projects
47 rated projects in this methodology · average score 4.6/10 · ranked by CarbonMeld's document-based assessment scores across all four dimensions: integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation.
What you're looking at
This page ranks projects using AMS-III.G by their CarbonMeld document-based assessment scores. The rank compares project assessments; it is not a rating of the methodology itself.
CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.
Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record. Registry / standard: CDM / UNFCCC · Gold Standard · Verra / VCS .
AMS-III.G: Landfill methane recovery
Methodology issuer: CDM / UNFCCC · Official methodology page.
Waste · Emission reductions
Projects collect and burn methane from landfills, either in flares or for useful energy. The method measures the greenhouse gas reductions from preventing methane releases.
Source for the activity description
Version 10.0 · Active at CDM / UNFCCC · status verified on
Version and status refer to the methodology at its issuer. Individual projects may use different versions; these facts do not establish credit eligibility in other programs.
ICVCM CCP: approved programs and versions
- Gold Standard · version(s) 9.0-10.0 · Official CCP decision listing · verified
- Verified Carbon Standard · version(s) 9.0-10.0 · Official CCP decision listing · verified
Approval applies to the programs and versions listed. The official decision and project-specific conditions must also be met for credits to carry a CCP label; this is not a label for the projects on this page.
- 46▲+1.2
- 56▲+0.1
- 65.9▲+0.1
- 75.8▼-0.4
- 85.8▲+0.6
- 95.7▼-0.3
- 105.7▲+0.4
- 115.6▼-0.2
- 125.5
- 135.5
- 145.5▲+0.3
- 155.4
- 165.3▲+0.7
- 175.3▼-0.1
- 18Huojia County Second MSW Landfill Site LFG Pollution Treatment and Comprehensive Utilization Project5.3▼-1.0
- 195.2▼-0.1
- 205.1▼-0.1
- 215.1▼-1.8
- 225▼-1.3
- 235▲+1.0
- 244.9▼-1.6
- 254.9
- 264.9▼-0.2
- 274.9▼-0.3
- 284.8▼-0.1
- 294.7▼-0.1
- 304.6▼-0.3
- 314.6▼-0.1
- 324.5
- 334.5▼-0.3
- 344.4
- 354.4▲+0.1
- 364.4▼-0.4
- 374.3
- 384.2▼-0.3
- 394▼-0.4
- 403.9▼-0.3
- 413.5
- 421.5
- 431.5
- 441.5
- 450.9▼-3.2
- 460.7▼-3.8
- 470.3▼-4.2
Rank is by document-based assessment score only. The registry status shown next to each project is a separate fact: inclusion in this ranking is not a statement of current validity or credit eligibility — projects suspended, withdrawn or terminated by their registry can still appear, with their status labelled. Read the methodology.