Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
ScoredVCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources), Waste handling and disposalUnited States of AmericaRegistry: RegisteredAMS-III.G

Wewoka Small Scale Landfill Gas Recovery and Thermal Energy Generation Project

VCS-879 ↗

#40of 694 in Methane#184of 1795 in United States#48of 1608 in Verra (VCS)#1of 48 in AMS-III.G

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 7.8 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

Wewoka Small Scale Landfill Gas Recovery and Thermal Energy Generation Project (United States of America) recovers methane from a landfill (landfill gas combusted in the Project kiln and Project flare) under AMS-III.G, AMS-I.C; registry status Registered (VCS), 173,769 credits issued (vintages 2011–2024). The documents name VERIFIT SAS as validation / verification body. The documents estimate 26,697 tCO2e per year. The latest verification report (17-September-2021 – 31-December-2024) verifies 82,153 tCO2e. The project also includes an energy component under AMS-I.C, not assessed here.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 48 registry documents (42 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology approved by ICVCMAMS-III.G

    The methodology meets the Core Carbon Principles; this project's credits do not carry the CCP label yet.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-18

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2011
4,9854,9850
2012
20,77920,7790
2013
19,32519,3250
2014
18,69618,6960
2015
17,94317,9430
2016
18,63518,6350
2017
20,16220,1620
2018
22,87722,8770
2019
19,498019,498
2021
2,71802,718
2022
2,71702,717
2023
2,71702,717
2024
2,71702,717
Total173,769143,40230,367

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAMS-III.G, AMS-I.C

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →