CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
Re-assessment pendingGSWindTurkeyRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Yuntdag Wind Power Project, Turkey

Developer: Innores Elektrik Uretim A.S

GS-614 ↗ · current registry ID: GS352

Worked comparison example (English)

#1889of 5087 in Renewable energy#222of 431 in Türkiye#627of 2172 in Gold Standard (GS)#1361of 3484 in ACM0002

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 10 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.8 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Scored2026-09-10medium confidence

evidence: 59/65 registry documents analyzed · 4 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

The Yuntdag Wind Power Project is a mature, VVB-verified wind facility in Turkey with confirmed additionality and reasonable leakage treatment, but its long history of corrective actions across multiple verification cycles, a project-specific baseline (contradicted by the monitoring report's 'jurisdictional' label), and low document extraction confidence temper confidence in data reliability. The project delivered approximately 93% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the current monitoring period, indicating conservative rather than inflated crediting.

Red Flags

4 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 10 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 4 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 65 registry documents (59 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2008
68,43568,4350
2009
93,73793,7370
2010
92,88692,8860
2011
138,505138,5050
2012
144,733144,7330
2013
141,271141,2710
2014
116,022116,0220
2015
30,58230,5820
2016
102,713102,7130
2017
109,344108,878466
2018
108,280108,2800
2019
110,897110,8970
2020
123,03099,30823,722
2021
116,31641,26475,052
2022
124,28271,79752,485
2023
112,48258,35554,127
2024
149,3470149,347
2025
24,925024,925
Total1,907,7871,527,663380,124

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2008–2009ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2009–2010ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2010ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2011ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2012ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2013ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2014–2015ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2016–2017ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  9. 2017–2018ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  10. 2018–2019ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  11. 2019–2020ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  12. 2020–2021ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  13. 2021–2022ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  14. 2022–2023ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  15. 2023–2024ACM0002 v21.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  16. 2024–2025ACM0002 v22.0current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →