Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Re-assessment pendingGSWindTurkeyRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Ziyaret Wind Power Project, Turkey

Developer: Fiba Yenilenebilir Enerji Holding A.Ş

GS-1086 ↗ · current registry ID: GS617

#1535of 5087 in Renewable energy#188of 431 in Türkiye#539of 2172 in Gold Standard (GS)#1108of 3484 in ACM0002

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 10 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.0 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Analysis

The Ziyaret Wind Power Project is a Gold Standard wind energy project with VVB-verified additionality (investment test) and smart-meter monitoring, delivering approximately 159% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the elapsed monitoring period. However, nine cross-document contradictions—including conflicting baseline methods, additionality test types, and grid emission factors—along with multiple unresolved corrective actions and a medium extraction confidence level, temper confidence in the data record.

Red Flags

3 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 10 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 3 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 46 registry documents (44 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2010
25,91322,9133,000
2011
84,16282,1622,000
2012
129,478129,4780
2013
128,828118,20510,623
2014
152,906152,9051
2015
156,353154,4931,860
2016
163,571163,5710
2017
145,928145,9280
2018
147,671147,6710
2019
143,235143,2350
2020
149,891147,3112,580
2021
152,15823,209128,949
2022
141,720110,68231,038
2023
140,457131,9488,509
2024
63,24512,14351,102
Total1,925,5161,685,854239,662

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2010–2011ACM0002 v11.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2011–2013ACM0002 v11.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2013–2014ACM0002 v11.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2014–2016ACM0002 v11.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2016–2017ACM0002 v11.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2016–2019ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2017–2019ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2019–2021ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  9. 2021–2023ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  10. 2023–2024ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  11. Period not statedACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →