CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
Re-assessment pendingBCRWaste handling and disposalArgentinaRegistry: RegisteredAMS-III.F

PROCESS OF NON-HAZARDOUS AGROINDUSTRIAL LIQUID ORGANIC WASTE

Developer: WORMS ARGENTINA SA

BCR-AR-763-13-002 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#47of 60 in Argentina#28of 43 in BioCarbon Registry (BCR)#34of 51 in AMS-III.F

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 26 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 4.1 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Scored2026-09-26medium confidenceLatest monitoring period ends: 2022-12-31

evidence:48/48registry documents analyzed · 5red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

This Argentine agroindustrial waste-processing project (BCR, AMS.III.F) has VVB-confirmed additionality and four years of operational monitoring, but is undermined by extensive data-quality findings (waste-quantity discrepancies across 2019–2023, evidence mismatches), a major grid-emission-factor contradiction (0.2318 vs 1.3 tCO₂/kWh), a 0% leakage deduction, and a project-specific modeled baseline with no reassessment. The project delivered roughly 120% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the elapsed monitoring period, but the volume of material findings and corrective actions required raises significant confidence concerns.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 48 registry documents (48 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish CORSIA eligibility per project.

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: methodology

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

Issuance data not yet available — check back soon.

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2019AM0057 v3.0.1current version

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2019–2023AM0057 v3.0.1current version

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2019–2023AMS-III.F v12.0current version

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2019–2023AM0057 v3.0.1current version

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. Period not statedAM0057 v3.0.1current version

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  • AM0057: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
  • AMS-III.F: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAMS.III.F
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →