CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredCDMHydroChinaRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Fujian Jiangle Gaotang Hydropower Project

Developer: Fujian Jinhu Power Co.,Ltd

CDM-1601 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#322of 4970 in Renewable energy#109of 3022 in China#243of 5395 in CDM (UNFCCC)#209of 3427 in ACM0002

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.7 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-04medium confidenceLatest verified monitoring: 2016-01-15

evidence:21/21registry documents analyzed · 0red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

Fujian Jiangle Gaotang Hydropower Project (China) generates grid-connected renewable electricity (low water-head hydropower, 2 sets of generators and turbines which single-unit capacity is 21MW and the total installed capacity of proposed project is 42MW) under ACM0002 version 06; registry status Registered (CDM), 469,593 credits issued (vintages 2011–2013). The documents name JCI CDM Center as validation / verification body. The documents estimate 111,368 tCO2e per year. The latest monitoring report (01/01/2015 – 15/01/2016) reports 185,280 tCO2e achieved. Credits issued so far are 84% of the ex-ante estimate for the crediting period elapsed.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 21 registry documents (21 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish CORSIA eligibility per project.

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2011
62,309062,309
2012
240,6420240,642
2013
166,6420166,642
Total469,5930469,593

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2009ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2009–2010ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2010–2011ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2011–2012ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2012ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2012ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2013ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2013–2014ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  9. 2013–2014ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  10. 2015–2016ACM0002 v6.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →