Shibeishan Wind Power Generation Project in Huilai County, Guangdong Province
Developer: Guangdong Yudean Shibeishan Wind Power Development Co. Ltd
#2979of 5035 in Renewable energy#1584of 3055 in China#3064of 5586 in CDM (UNFCCC)#2135of 3458 in ACM0002
Assessment
Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.
Findings
Risk Indicators
🔒
🔒
🔒
🔒
🔒
🔒
Score Breakdown
Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium
Detailed Analysis
The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium
Evidence
Eligibility & market
What can you claim with this credit?
Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).
Airlines (CORSIA)
Not published
This registry does not publish CORSIA eligibility per project.
Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)
No ICVCM information
No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.
Removal or reduction
Emission reduction or avoidance
Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.
Source: project sector
Paris Agreement (Article 6)
Not published
This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.
Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 43,292 | 0 | 43,292 | |
| 2010 | 145,923 | 0 | 145,923 | |
| 2011 | 131,552 | 0 | 131,552 | |
| 2012 | 259,727 | 0 | 259,727 | |
| 2013 | 53,234 | 0 | 53,234 | |
| 2015 | 265,368 | 0 | 265,368 | |
| Total | 899,096 | 0 | 899,096 |
Where to buy
Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
Profile & governance
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Contest this rating
Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.
Contest this rating →Share this rating
