Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
ScoredGSBiogas - HeatIndiaRegistry: RegisteredGS-BIODIGESTER

Hassan Composite Vermicompost Biogas Project

Developer: GoodPlanet

GS-1083 ↗ · current registry ID: GS615

#84of 525 in Biogas#895of 2807 in India#706of 2172 in Gold Standard (GS)#2of 7 in GS-BIODIGESTER

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.9 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

Hassan Composite Vermicompost Biogas Project (India) installs household biodigesters whose biogas replaces fossil fuels or biomass used for domestic energy (biogas slurry mixed with other agricultural waste as a 'organic compost' used as organic fertiliser on agricultural lands, average 3 tractors (i.e. around 6 tons) per beneficiary per year) under GS Baseline and Monitoring Methodology Biodigester (per the registry); registry status Registered (GS), 24,864 credits issued (vintages 2008–2018). The latest verification report (2017-01-01 – 2018-10-31) verifies 3,731 tCO2e. The latest achieved amount read is of an earlier period (2016-01-01 – 2016-12-31): 2,731 tCO2e, per the monitoring report.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 23 registry documents (23 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2008
3073070
2009
2,0672,0670
2010
2,7112,62289
2011
2,6732,6730
2012
2,7092,7090
2013
2,6262,6260
2014
2,7002,7000
2015
2,6092,6090
2016
2,7312,7310
2017
2,0352,0350
2018
1,6961,6960
Total24,86424,77589

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceGS Baseline and Monitoring Methodology Biodigester (per the registry)

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →