CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Rankings · methodology

Top GS-BIODIGESTER projects

7 rated projects in this methodology · average score 4.4/10 · ranked by CarbonMeld's document-based assessment scores across all four dimensions: integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation.

← All leaderboards · Full database

What you're looking at

This page ranks projects using GS-BIODIGESTER by their CarbonMeld document-based assessment scores. The rank compares project assessments; it is not a rating of the methodology itself.

CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.

Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record. Registry / standard: Gold Standard .

GS-BIODIGESTER: Baseline and Monitoring Methodology for Biodigesters

Methodology issuer: Gold Standard · Official methodology page.

Description not yet reviewed against the official text.

#1Xuyong household biogas Gold Standard VER ProjectGSChinaBiogasRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending5.2/10▲+0.5#2Nagapattinam District Biogas Project for Tsunami affected PoorGSIndiaBiogasRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending4.9/10#3Hassan Composite Vermicompost Biogas ProjectGSIndiaBiogasRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending4.9/10▼-0.6
  1. 4
    Sidlaghatta Biogas ProjectGSIndiaBiogasRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    4.4▲+0.6
  2. 5
    Arakalagudu Biodigester Project IIGSIndiaBiogasRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    4.2▼-0.3
  3. 6
    Biogas Tanks in Guizhou Province in ChinaGSChinaBiogasRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    4▲+0.1
  4. 7
    Zhaoyang rural household biogas tank programGSChinaBiogasRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    3.1▼-0.1

Rank is by document-based assessment score only. The registry status shown next to each project is a separate fact: inclusion in this ranking is not a statement of current validity or credit eligibility — projects suspended, withdrawn or terminated by their registry can still appear, with their status labelled. Read the methodology.