Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
ScoredGSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticRwandaVintage 2016, 2017Registry: RegisteredGS-TPDDTEC

GS2397 - GS1265 - African Biomass Energy Conservation POA - Rwanda Biomass Conservation (2)

Developer: Hestian Innovation

GS-321 ↗ · current registry ID: GS2397

#248of 1735 in Industrial#15of 148 in Rwanda#445of 2172 in Gold Standard (GS)#61of 313 in GS-TPDDTEC

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 7.0 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

GS2397 - GS1265 - African Biomass Energy Conservation POA - Rwanda Biomass Conservation (2) (Rwanda) distributes improved cookstoves or other technologies that reduce household thermal energy use (Portable Clay Stoves (PCS)) under TPDDTEC, version 1.0; registry status Registered (GS), 174,759 credits issued (vintages 2013–2019). The documents name Earthood Services Private Limited as validation / verification body. The verification report for the period (2017-03-16 – 2019-08-28) verifies 37,741 tCO2e.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 22 registry documents (22 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology approved by ICVCMGS TPDDTEC

    The methodology meets the Core Carbon Principles; this project's credits do not carry the CCP label yet.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2013
7,4517,4510
2014
16,30016,017283
2015
52,48348,9433,540
2016
51,79347,4204,373
2017
24,15110024,051
2018
15,35113,5541,797
2019
7,2307,079151
Total174,759140,56434,195

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceTPDDTEC, version 1.0

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →