Skip to main content
ScoredGSBiogas - HeatChinaRegistry: RegisteredAMS-I.I

GS1239 Sichuan Rural Poor-Household Biogas Development Programme PoA- CPA Nb. SCHHBG-2014-075

Developer: Chengdu Oasis Science & Technology Co., Ltd

GS-632 ↗ · current registry ID: GS3589

#335of 370 in Biogas#2265of 2297 in China#1787of 1869 in Gold Standard (GS)#76of 78 in AMS-I.I

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 3.5 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

The Sichuan Rural Poor-Household Biogas Programme has a verified additionality assessment and a recently reassessed measured baseline, but the verification process uncovered an extraordinary volume of material findings (over 80) and corrective actions (over 60), including multiple calculation errors in baseline, project, and emission-reduction figures. The 0% leakage deduction (reduced from 10% in the original PDD) is justified only as 'deemed negligible,' and permanence risk is unaddressed with no buffer pool. Data reliability is further undermined by significant contradictions between the 2023 and 2024 verification reports on verified emission reductions.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 28 registry documents (26 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMAMS-I.I

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2015
7,81307,813
2016
9,24809,248
2017
9,38609,386
2018
9,32509,325
2019
7,83907,839
2020
8,29108,291
2021
8,66808,668
2022
8,42008,420
2023
8,67108,671
2024
7,37207,372
2025
3740374
Total85,407085,407

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAMS-I.I. - Biogas/biomass thermal applications for households/small users; AMS-III.R. - Methane recovery in agricultural activities at household/small farm level

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →