Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
ScoredVCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)IndiaRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Sinner Wind Power Project in Maharashtra

Developer: Bindu Vayu Urja Private Limited

VCS-1207 ↗

#916of 5086 in Renewable energy#473of 2807 in India#562of 1608 in Verra (VCS)#679of 3483 in ACM0002

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.3 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

Sinner Wind Power Project in Maharashtra (India) generates grid-connected renewable electricity under ACM0002 version 12.3.0; registry status Registered (VCS), 166,902 credits issued (vintages 2012–2022). The documents name TÜV NORD CERT GmbH as validation body and Earthood Services Private Limited (2018-07-01 – 2020-03-31), KBS Certification Services Pvt. Ltd (2020-04-01 – 2021-05-31), LGAI Technological Center, S.A. (Applus+ Certification) (2021-06-01 – 2022-02-28, 2022-03-01 – 2022-03-31) as verification bodies. The documents estimate 54,274 tCO2e per year. The latest verification report (01-March-2022 – 31-March-2022) verifies 1,118 tCO2e. The latest monitoring period achieved 57% of its ex-ante estimate (per the monitoring report).

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 35 registry documents (24 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-18

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2012
7,5917,5910
2015
17,09517,0950
2016
26,77326,7730
2017
22,87122,8710
2018
27,54027,5400
2019
23,78123,7810
2020
18,1442,37115,773
2021
20,611020,611
2022
2,49602,496
Total166,902128,02238,880

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002 version 12.3.0

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →