CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredVCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources); Waste handling and disposalChinaRegistry: RegisteredAMS-III.G

Yichang Huangjiawan MSW Landfill site LFG Recovery to power project

Developer: Henan BCCY Environmental Energy CO.,LTD

VCS-2680 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#110of 3052 in China#248of 1574 in Verra (VCS)#1of 47 in AMS-III.G

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.8 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-13medium confidenceLatest verified period ends: 2022-05-10

evidence: 14/19 registry documents read · 0 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

Yichang Huangjiawan MSW Landfill site LFG Recovery to power project (China) recovers methane from a landfill (landfill gas captured and fed to gas engines for power generation, with electricity exported to the grid) under AMS-III.G version 7.0, AMS-I.D version 17.0; registry status Registered (VCS), 224,201 credits issued (vintages 2016–2022). The documents name LGAI Technological Center, S.A. (Applus+ Certification) as validation body and LGAI Technological Center, S.A. (Applus+ Certification) (2015-11-18 – 2020-12-31), Shenzhen CTI International Certification Co., Ltd (2021-01-01 – 2022-05-10) as verification bodies. The latest verification report (01-01-2021 – 10-05-2022) verifies 43,478 tCO2e. The project also includes an energy component under AMS-I.D, not assessed here.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 19 registry documents (14 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology approved by ICVCMAMS-III.G

    The methodology meets the Core Carbon Principles; this project's credits do not carry the CCP label yet.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: methodology

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2016
37,611037,611
2017
37,769037,769
2018
36,267036,267
2019
35,081035,081
2020
33,995033,995
2021
32,156032,156
2022
11,322011,322
Total224,2010224,201

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2012AMS-I.D v17.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2012AMS-III.G v7.0since replaced by v10.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 9.0-10.0) · official page · verified on

  3. 2015–2020AMS-I.D v17.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2015–2020AMS-III.G v7.0since replaced by v10.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 9.0-10.0) · official page · verified on

  5. 2021–2022AMS-I.D v17.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2021–2022AMS-III.G v7.0since replaced by v10.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 9.0-10.0) · official page · verified on

  7. 2021–2022AMS-I.D v17.0since replaced by v18.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2021–2022AMS-III.G v7.0since replaced by v10.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (VCS: 9.0-10.0) · official page · verified on

  • AMS-I.D: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
  • AMS-III.G: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

Being within an ICVCM-approved version range is information only: it does not mean these credits carry the CCP label, which the registry assigns to each issuance.

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAMS-III.G version 7.0, AMS-I.D version 17.0
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →