CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredVCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)TurkeyRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

DARICA-1 99 MW Hydro Power Plant Project, Turkey

Developer: Bilgin Guc Santralleri Enerji Uretim A.S

VCS-506 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#389of 5062 in Renewable energy#58of 431 in Türkiye#289of 1574 in Verra (VCS)#297of 3458 in ACM0002

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.7 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-12medium confidenceLatest verified period ends: 2019-10-09

evidence: 22/29 registry documents read · 0 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

DARICA-1 99 MW Hydro Power Plant Project, Turkey (Turkey) generates grid-connected renewable electricity (run-of-river hydro) under ACM0002 version 07; registry status Registered (VCS), 1,698,401 credits issued (vintages 2009–2019). The documents name Carbon Check (India) Private Ltd as validation / verification body. The latest verification report (01-January-2018 – 09-October-2019) verifies 318,925 tCO2e.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 29 registry documents (22 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
46,44546,4450
2010
433,404433,4040
2012
175,228175,13494
2013
126,5600126,560
2014
79,78244,94834,834
2015
170,0472,124167,923
2016
197,9300197,930
2017
150,08018,271131,809
2018
152,7050152,705
2019
166,220835165,385
Total1,698,401721,161977,240

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2009–2010ACM0002 v7.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2010–2011ACM0002 v7.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2012ACM0002 v7.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2013–2017ACM0002 v7.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  5. 2018–2019ACM0002 v7.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  6. Period not statedACM0002 v7.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+21)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002 version 07
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →