CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredVCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)TurkeyRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Lamas III-IV 37.3 MW Hydroelectric Power Plant Project, Turkey

Developer: TGT Enerji Üretim ve Tic. A.Ş

VCS-726 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#413of 5074 in Renewable energy#56of 431 in Türkiye#280of 1588 in Verra (VCS)#325of 3470 in ACM0002

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.7 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-13medium confidenceLatest verified period ends: 2019-10-31

evidence: 14/24 registry documents read · 0 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

Lamas III-IV 37.3 MW Hydroelectric Power Plant Project, Turkey (Turkey) generates grid-connected renewable electricity (run-of-river hydro, 37.3 MW) under ACM0002 version 10; registry status Registered (VCS), 403,594 credits issued (vintages 2009–2019). The documents name Bureau Veritas Certification Holding Sas as validation body and Bureau Veritas Certification Holding Sas (2011-01-01 – 2012-12-31), Re-Consult Rüzgar Enerjisi Danışmanlık İç ve Dış Tic. Ltd. Şti (2013-01-01 – 2015-03-31), RINA Services S.p.A (2015-04-01 – 2019-10-31) as verification bodies. The latest monitoring report (01-Nov-2019 – 29-Feb-2024) reports 99,540 tCO2e achieved.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 24 registry documents (14 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
5,2535,2530
2010
44,03944,0390
2011
49,47449,4740
2012
76,45776,4570
2013
69,13269,1320
2015
25,53725,5370
2016
4,5474,5470
2017
33,23633,16967
2018
22,91122,9110
2019
73,00872,194814
Total403,594402,713881

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2009–2010ACM0002 v8.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2011–2012ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2013–2015ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2015–2019ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2019–2024ACM0002 v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002 version 10
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →