Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Re-assessment pendingGSOtherThailandRegistry: RegisteredACM0001

Bangkok Kamphaeng Saen West: Landfill Gas to Electricity Project

Developer: Sindicatum Carbon Capital International Limited

Methodology: ACM0001 (CDM)

GS-225 ↗ · current registry ID: GS1370

#612of 655 in Methane#116of 121 in Thailand#2069of 2179 in Gold Standard (GS)#258of 279 in ACM0001

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 1 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 3.8 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

How this analysis was made

Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v2.1 · analysed on 1 Sep 2026 · 21/23 registry documents analyzed · re-assessment under v2.2 pending

Analysis

This CDM landfill gas-to-electricity project in Thailand has a confirmed investment additionality test and a measured project-specific baseline, but is severely undermined by 12 corrective action requests, incorrect GHG emission values, and calibration failures identified during verification. The 0% leakage deduction lacks adequate justification, no buffer pool or permanence mechanism is documented, and multiple contradictions across documents raise material concerns about the reliability of claimed reductions.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Gates applied

The gates applied to this score are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 1 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 23 registry documents (21 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 2 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology approved by ICVCMACM0001

    The methodology meets the Core Carbon Principles; this project's credits do not carry the CCP label yet.

    Source: ICVCM assessment · ICVCM table read on 4 Oct 2026

    Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label · read on 2 Nov 2026

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-11-02

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2012
254,7540254,754
2013
371,6440371,644
2014
296,4380296,438
Total922,8360922,836

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2011ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  2. 2011ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  3. 2011–2012ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  4. 2012–2013ACM0001the documents for this period state different versions (v11.0, v13.0)

    monitoring report + verification report

  5. 2013–2014ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  6. 2014–2015ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  7. 2015–2016ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  8. 2016–2017ACM0001 v11.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  • ACM0001: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

Being within an ICVCM-approved version range is information only: it does not mean these credits carry the CCP label, which the registry assigns to each issuance.

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Records with the same name in other registries

Records in another registry with the same name, country and methodology. Each has its own credits, documents and score.

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.