CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

Re-assessment pending

MRF wind power project in Tamilnadu managed by Enercon India Limited

Standard
VCS
Methodology
ACM0002 (CDM)
Registry
VCS-380 ↗ · Registered
Country
India
Credit type
Energy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)
Developer
Wind World (India) Ltd
Vintage
2022
Worked comparison example (English)

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 3 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.4 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Analysed on 3 Sep 2026medium confidenceLatest monitoring period ends:

evidence: 59/59 registry documents analyzed · 4 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
Verra (VCS) How our current method reads projects of this standard
Methodology
ACM0002 How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v2.1 · analysed on 3 Sep 2026 · 59/59 registry documents analyzed · re-assessment under v2.2 pending

Analysis

A registered VCS wind power project in Tamil Nadu with a confirmed investment-test additionality and jurisdictional baseline, but plagued by recurring documentation and data-quality issues across multiple verification cycles. The low extraction confidence and numerous closed corrective actions (methodology version errors, meter calibration gaps, parameter omissions) undermine confidence in the MRV record despite the straightforward nature of the underlying technology.

Red Flags

4 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Gates applied

The gates applied to this score are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 3 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 4 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 59 registry documents (59 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 1 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment · ICVCM table read on 4 Oct 2026

    Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label · read on 1 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2006
25,61325,6130
2007
26,21826,2180
2008
27,43827,4380
2009
29,19929,1990
2010
28,07528,0750
2011
26,83726,8370
2012
29,64029,6400
2013
18,86918,8690
2014
30,29330,2930
2015
4894890
2016
24,03024,0300
2017
25,39425,3940
2018
41,89641,8960
2020
21,56421,5640
2021
22,42722,4270
2022
17,6313,93313,698
Total395,613381,91513,698

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2006–2009ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2009–2011ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2011–2013ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2013–2014ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2014ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2014–2016ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2016–2017ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2017–2018ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  9. 2018–2019ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  10. 2020ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  11. 2021ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  12. 2022ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+25)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

Marketplaces

Each listing shows what the shop published on the day it was checked. The registry balance on this page is not a seller's stock, and some shops show no price.

ClimateBridge Exchange

the shop's home page — no offer page for this project

$6.00/tCO2

Vintage 2022

3,644 tCO2 available

checked on 31 Oct 2026

↗
+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Contest this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.