200 MW Wind Power Project in Tamil Nadu by Orange Sironj
GS-1096 ↗ · current registry ID: GS6290
#120of 1935 in Renewable energy#57of 975 in India#42of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#86of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A 200 MW wind power project in Tamil Nadu with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and a standard grid-emission-factor baseline. The project is fundamentally low-risk for a renewable energy credit, but seven contradictions across documents—including on FPIC, baseline method, and benefit sharing—undermine confidence in the data record. The verified ERR (650,601 tCO₂e) exceeds the claimed figure (512,411), which is atypical but explainable for a wind project where actual generation can outperform estimates.
Red Flags
- Seven contradictions between documents, including FPIC (true in verification report vs. false in PDD), baseline method (project vs. jurisdictional), and benefit sharing (described vs. not described), raising data-reliability concerns
- Verified ERR (650,601) exceeds claimed ERR (512,411) by ~27%, an unusual direction that warrants scrutiny of the monitoring methodology
- Leakage justification is contradictory: the verification report states it was 'not addressed' while the monitoring report says it was 'deemed negligible'
- CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated in any available document, leaving dual-channel risk unassessed
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 447,192 | 447,192 | 0 | |
| 2020 | 555,025 | 555,025 | 0 | |
| 2021 | 521,010 | 300,877 | 220,133 | |
| 2022 | 512,411 | 0 | 512,411 | |
| Total | 2,035,638 | 1,303,094 | 732,544 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
Renewable energy – no reversal risk
0% deduction; justification contradicted across docs
Grid EF 0.9652 (2022); method label contradicted
Grievance mechanism present; FPIC and benefit-sharing contradicted
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →