Skip to main content
CDMWindIndiaACM0002

25.70 MW Bundled Wind Power Project in Udumalpet, Tamilnadu

CDM-1015 ↗

#1289of 1935 in Renewable energy#684of 975 in India#1008of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#1003of 1287 in ACM0002

4.7/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

A 25.7 MW bundled wind project in Tamil Nadu, India, registered under CDM with a VVB-confirmed combined additionality test and a jurisdictional grid-emission-factor baseline. However, the project record is marred by a ten-fold discrepancy in the claimed emissions-reduction figure between the PDD and the validation report, a contradictory leakage justification, and eleven material findings that required corrective action. The absence of verified performance data and several key monitoring parameters limits confidence in the project's actual delivery.

Red Flags

  • Ten-fold discrepancy in total claimed emissions reductions: the PDD (2014) states 40,756 tCO₂e while the validation report (2007) states 407,560 tCO₂e — a factor-of-ten gap that undermines data reliability
  • Leakage justification is contradictory across documents: the 2008 monitoring report describes leakage as 'deemed negligible' while the 2013 monitoring report records it as 'not addressed', leaving the 0% deduction without a consistent, documented rationale
  • Baseline method is described as 'project' in the 2013 monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the 2014 validation report, creating ambiguity about which baseline approach was actually applied
  • Eleven material findings were raised during validation, including unclear additionality justification for subprojects taken at different times, inadequately described project boundaries, and an incomplete monitoring plan
  • No verified emissions-reduction figure was found in any available document, making it impossible to confirm actual performance against the claimed baseline

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2011
107,3900107,390
2013
127,6630127,663
Total235,0530235,053

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

Not addressed

Leakage

0% deduction, contradictory justification

Baseline

Jurisdictional EF but method description inconsistent

Safeguards

Mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not found

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-24ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents