3.5MW Manuni Hydro Electric Project in Himanchal Pradesh by Winsome Textile Industries Ltd
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified Additionality was tested using an investment test and the VVB confirmed it in the monitoring report.
missing Leakage is not addressed, and the project uses a project baseline with no reassessment date found.
Transparency
verified The monitoring period is clearly stated for 2020-01-01 to 2021-12-31, and the VVB is named as Earthood Services Private Limited.
missing The record does not state total claimed emission reductions, and the usage monitoring method is not found in the extracted documents.
Claim Safety
verified The project is a renewable hydropower activity under AMS-I.D., which generally lowers reversal risk compared with land-use projects.
missing The contradiction in verified emission reductions and the lack of leakage justification increase over-crediting risk.
Documentation
verified Thirteen documents were used, including issuance, PDD, validation report, and monitoring report, with high extraction confidence.
verified FPIC, grievance mechanism, and benefit-sharing are all mentioned in the extracted record.
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The monitoring report dated 2022-08-06 shows an investment test and states that additionality was verified by Earthood Services Private Limited, which supports the project’s core integrity case. No material findings or corrective actions were reported, but the baseline is project-specific and no reassessment date is found, while leakage is marked as not addressed despite a 0% deduction.
Transparency
The documentation identifies the VVB, the monitoring period from 2020-01-01 to 2021-12-31, and the methodology version used, which helps traceability. At the same time, total claimed emission reductions are not stated in the extracted record, and the usage monitoring method is not found, leaving gaps in MRV transparency.
Claim Safety
As a hydropower project under AMS-I.D., the activity type is relatively straightforward and does not carry the permanence risks seen in sequestration projects. Still, the absence of leakage justification and the discrepancy between verified emission reduction figures in validation documents reduce confidence that the credited volume is fully conservative.
Documentation
The record draws on 13 documents and includes issuance, PDD, validation, and monitoring materials, with high extraction confidence. FPIC, a grievance mechanism, and benefit-sharing are mentioned, which strengthens the documentary trail. However, the crediting period is long and no baseline reassessment date is available, so the documentation is solid but not complete.
Overall
I privileged the later validation report’s lower verified emission reduction figure of 22,246 over the earlier 29,477 figure because it is more recent and therefore likely reflects the corrected or final validated value. That contradiction is a meaningful reliability issue and pulls the score down, even though the project otherwise has decent documentation and VVB-confirmed additionality. The project is not a reversal-prone land-use activity, but the weak leakage treatment and project-specific baseline keep the overall assessment only moderate.
Audit Analysis
This is a registered VCS hydropower project with VVB-confirmed additionality and no material findings reported in the monitoring record. However, leakage is not addressed, the baseline is project-specific rather than standardized, and there is a material discrepancy in verified emission reductions between validation documents that weakens confidence in the claimed volume.
Project Description
Proponent: Winsome Textile Industries Limited Protocol categories: Energy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources) Protocols: AMS-I.D. Estimated annual GHG reductions: 17619 tCO2e Region: Asia Registration date: 2020-07-09
Red Flags
- Leakage is marked as not addressed, with a 0% deduction but no supporting justification in the extracted record.
- Validation documents conflict on verified emission reductions, with 29,477 in the earlier validation report and 22,246 in the later one.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 29,477 | 29,477 | 0 | |
| 2020 | 12,366 | 0 | 12,366 | |
| 2021 | 9,880 | 0 | 9,880 | |
| Total | 51,723 | 29,477 | 22,246 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Provide a clear leakage assessment with justification for the 0% deduction, or quantify and explain any leakage treatment.
- Resolve the emission reduction discrepancy across validation documents and publish a reconciled, final verified figure with supporting explanation.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
Avoidance project with no reversal risk
Leakage not justified
Project baseline, reassessment not stated
FPIC and grievance mechanism present
CORSIA/CCP status not stated
Where to buy
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →