Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyIndiaAMS-I.D

4.5 MW Biomass (Agricultural Residue) Based Power Generation Unit of M/s Matrix Power Pvt. Ltd. (MPPL)

CDM-0281 ↗

#51of 196 in Biomass#224of 387 in India#89of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#106of 417 in AMS-I.D

5.1/ 10
Integrity
5.3
Transparency
4.3
Claim Safety
5.2
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

A 4.5 MW agricultural-residue biomass power project in India registered under CDM (AMS-I.D v13) with a combined additionality test and a project-specific baseline. The project shows moderate integrity and claim safety, but significant transparency gaps remain — verified emission-reduction figures, feedstock sustainability data, and monitoring methodology details are absent from the extracted record. The 18 corrective actions logged during validation and a baseline-method terminology contradiction between the validation and monitoring reports warrant caution.

Red Flags

  • 18 corrective actions were required during validation, including redefinition of the baseline per AMS-I.D v13, clarification of the project boundary, and provision of ex-ante emission-reduction calculations — indicating substantial initial documentation weaknesses
  • Baseline method is described as 'project' in the 2011 monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the 2008 validation report, creating ambiguity about the actual baseline construction
  • Verified emission-reduction figures are not present in the extracted record; only claimed totals (19,722.83 tCO₂ in 2011; 21,729.58 tCO₂ in 2009) are available, preventing independent confirmation of actual reductions
  • No feedstock sustainability assessment, no LCA, and no grievance mechanism or FPIC documentation were found in the available documents

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2006
89,627089,627
2007
19,993019,993
2009
21,538021,538
2010
21,728021,728
2011
20,261020,261
2012
19,722019,722
Total192,8690192,869

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test applied but VVB confirmation not explicitly st

Permanence

No buffer pool or reversal data stated; low inherent risk fo

Leakage

0% deduction with general-guidance justification; no quantif

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; method label contradicts between

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned but no FPIC, grievance mechanism, or be

Double-claim

CCP and CORSIA status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-24AMS-I.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents