4.5 MW Biomass (Agricultural Residue) Based Power Generation Unit of M/s Matrix Power Pvt. Ltd. (MPPL)
#51of 196 in Biomass#224of 387 in India#89of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#106of 417 in AMS-I.D
Audit Analysis
A 4.5 MW agricultural-residue biomass power project in India registered under CDM (AMS-I.D v13) with a combined additionality test and a project-specific baseline. The project shows moderate integrity and claim safety, but significant transparency gaps remain — verified emission-reduction figures, feedstock sustainability data, and monitoring methodology details are absent from the extracted record. The 18 corrective actions logged during validation and a baseline-method terminology contradiction between the validation and monitoring reports warrant caution.
Red Flags
- 18 corrective actions were required during validation, including redefinition of the baseline per AMS-I.D v13, clarification of the project boundary, and provision of ex-ante emission-reduction calculations — indicating substantial initial documentation weaknesses
- Baseline method is described as 'project' in the 2011 monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the 2008 validation report, creating ambiguity about the actual baseline construction
- Verified emission-reduction figures are not present in the extracted record; only claimed totals (19,722.83 tCO₂ in 2011; 21,729.58 tCO₂ in 2009) are available, preventing independent confirmation of actual reductions
- No feedstock sustainability assessment, no LCA, and no grievance mechanism or FPIC documentation were found in the available documents
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 89,627 | 0 | 89,627 | |
| 2007 | 19,993 | 0 | 19,993 | |
| 2009 | 21,538 | 0 | 21,538 | |
| 2010 | 21,728 | 0 | 21,728 | |
| 2011 | 20,261 | 0 | 20,261 | |
| 2012 | 19,722 | 0 | 19,722 | |
| Total | 192,869 | 0 | 192,869 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test applied but VVB confirmation not explicitly st
No buffer pool or reversal data stated; low inherent risk fo
0% deduction with general-guidance justification; no quantif
Project-specific baseline; method label contradicts between
Safeguards mentioned but no FPIC, grievance mechanism, or be
CCP and CORSIA status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →