49.5 MW Wind Power Project by Master Wind Energy Limited in Pakistan

Integrity

The monitoring report confirms additionality through an investment test, and the VVB is named as Emergent Ventures International Pte. Ltd., which supports a solid integrity assessment. Leakage is treated as negligible with a 0% deduction, and no material findings or corrective actions were reported. The main weakness is that buffer pool treatment and baseline reassessment timing are not stated in available documents, limiting full permanence and baseline review confidence.

Transparency

Transparency is fairly good because the monitoring report states the monitoring period and shows total ERs claimed and verified at 417,782, indicating no issuance discrepancy. The record also identifies the registry, methodology, methodology version, and VVB. However, usage monitoring method is not stated in available documents, and buffer pool treatment is also not found in the extracted record.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is strong for a renewable wind project because the project uses ACM0002 and the verified issuance matches the amount claimed exactly. The leakage deduction is 0% with a stated negligible justification, which reduces over-crediting concerns. Still, CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated in available documents, so the risk of overlapping market claims cannot be fully assessed.

Documentation

Documentation quality is good overall: the extracted record cites nine documents and includes issuance, PDD, validation report, and monitoring report sources. The extraction confidence is high, and the monitoring report is dated 2022-01-26, which is reasonably recent relative to the monitoring period ending 2021-08-31. Some important items remain unstated, including buffer pool percentage, reversal details, and baseline reassessment timing.

Overall

Overall, this project scores well because the core issuance evidence is consistent, additionality was VVB-verified, and there were no material findings or corrective actions. There are no contradictions in the extracted record, so no reliability penalty is needed on that basis. The main score limitations come from missing documentation on buffer pool treatment, usage monitoring, and market-eligibility status rather than from direct adverse evidence.