50 MW Wind Power Project in Madhya Pradesh, India
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified Additionality was confirmed by the VVB, and the project uses a combined additionality test under ACM0002.
missing The verification report lists multiple corrective actions and says key monitoring parameters and the ER sheet did not match the registered passport.
Transparency
verified The monitoring period is stated for 2024, and the project has an identified VVB, Applus+ Certification.
missing The record shows a large gap between claimed and verified emission reductions, while usage monitoring details are not stated in available documents.
Claim Safety
verified The project is an avoidance-type wind project with a recent baseline reassessment in 2023, which is directionally supportive.
missing Leakage is only described as deemed negligible, with no quantified deduction, and the record does not state CORSIA or CCP status.
Documentation
verified Multiple official document types were used, including the verification report, validation report, monitoring report, and PDD.
missing Extraction confidence is low, and the verification report contains several unresolved corrective actions and document mismatches.
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The project has a meaningful positive signal because the validation report confirms a combined additionality test and the VVB accepted additionality, while the baseline was last reassessed in 2023. That said, the verification report dated 2019 records three corrective action requests and two clarification requests, including that the monitoring report and ER sheet did not match the registered passport and that some documents were missing. Leakage is only described as deemed negligible, with no quantified deduction, and reversal handling is not addressed in the extracted record.
Transparency
Transparency is mixed. The monitoring period is clearly stated and the project has a named verifier, but usage monitoring is not described and the record does not provide a quantified leakage deduction or buffer pool percentage. The extracted figures also show a substantial difference between claimed and verified emission reductions, which weakens confidence in the reporting trail.
Claim Safety
Claim safety is moderate but not strong. A wind power avoidance project with ACM0002 and a recent baseline reassessment is generally safer than many credit types, but the baseline remains project-specific rather than jurisdictional and leakage is only treated as negligible without a quantified deduction. CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated, so dual-market claim risk cannot be ruled out from the extracted record.
Documentation
Documentation breadth is decent because the extracted record draws on several official documents, including the verification report, validation report, monitoring report, and PDD. However, min extraction confidence is low, which lowers reliability, and the verification report itself notes unresolved corrective actions and inconsistencies between the monitoring report, passport, and ER sheet. The crediting-period contradiction also suggests the document set is not fully consistent across sources.
Overall
I privileged the verification report for findings on corrective actions and leakage because it is the most direct assurance document, and I privileged the more recent monitoring report for the crediting-period contradiction because it is later and more operationally current. The contradictions matter: additionality test type differs between the PDD and validation report, leakage is treated differently across reports, reversal status is inconsistent, and the crediting period conflicts across documents. These reliability issues, together with low extraction confidence and unresolved CARs/CLs, pull the score down even though the project has some strong structural positives.
Audit Analysis
This is a Gold Standard wind project with VVB-confirmed additionality and a recent baseline reassessment, which supports the core project case. However, the record shows multiple corrective actions, a low extraction-confidence warning, and important gaps around leakage, reversal handling, and registry/claim eligibility, which reduce confidence in the claimed reductions.
Project Description
This is a 50 MW wind power project located in the Indian state of Madhya Pradesh, promoted by Orange Bercha Wind Power Pvt Ltd. The project consists of 25 wind turbine generators of 2 MW each generating clean electricity with utilization of wind energy. The project has conducted an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) study in line with the IFC guidelines while engaging local community through frequent stakeholder consultations. It has played an important role in reducing CO2 emissions by generating 110 GWh of clean electricity annually, which is equivalent to powering 25,500 households every year. Orange Renewable as a socially responsible organization is dedicated to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives to improve the quality of life in the projects' vicinity. Along these lines, Orange Renewable consistently invests in the following thematic areas: Enhancing the quality of education Supporting the "Clean India" initiative of the Government of India by investing in sanitary infrastructure in schools and community centers Augmenting medical and health care facilities Potable water supply infrastructure Employment generation Women empowerment Safeguarding environment In keeping with the above thematic focus, the following specific initiatives have been undertaken in the project vicinity: Distribution of much needed equipment such as chairs, stools, benches and books in the local Sr. Higher Secondary School benefitting over 200 children. Tree plantation drives in schools, sub-stations and public places are conducted on a regular basis, to create awareness/sensitivity towards protection of environment. The Company is supporting 100 cancer affected children every year on a pan-India basis under the project "Adopt a Child (AAC)" of the "CanKids Kidscan" initiative, whose vision is to give a fair chance of survival to children who otherwise would have died for want of treatment. Organised health camps in Jhar, S
Red Flags
- The verification report records three corrective action requests and two clarification requests, including mismatches between the monitoring report and the registered passport.
- The extracted record shows a large discrepancy between claimed and verified emission reductions, and the contradiction log also flags conflicting crediting-period and reversal information.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 60,020 | 60,020 | 0 | |
| 2017 | 112,954 | 112,254 | 700 | |
| 2018 | 119,432 | 119,432 | 0 | |
| 2019 | 114,954 | 114,829 | 125 | |
| 2020 | 94,561 | 89,115 | 5,446 | |
| 2021 | 114,801 | 4,518 | 110,283 | |
| 2022 | 102,957 | 0 | 102,957 | |
| 2023 | 26,232 | 0 | 26,232 | |
| Total | 745,911 | 500,168 | 245,743 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Publish a reconciled monitoring package that resolves the passport, MR, and ER-sheet mismatches and clearly explains the claimed-versus-verified reduction gap.
- Provide quantified leakage treatment, explicit reversal/permanence handling, and clear registry/claim eligibility status for CORSIA and any CCP-related claims.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
No buffer or reversal treatment stated
Negligible leakage claimed, not quantified
Project baseline, reassessed in 2023
FPIC, grievance mechanism, and benefit sharing
CORSIA/CCP status not stated
Where to buy
Marketplaces
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →