CDMWindIndiaACM0002

51 MW wind power project of ONGC at Surajbari, Gujarat in India

CDM-2856 ↗

#191of 770 in Renewable energy#122of 387 in India#38of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#146of 383 in ACM0002

5.7/ 10
Integrity
7.2
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
6.0
Documentation
4.0

Scored2026-08-25medium confidence

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Audit Analysis

A 51 MW wind project in Gujarat with a jurisdictional baseline and VVB-confirmed investment additionality test, presenting a fundamentally sound design. However, the available record lacks a verified ERR figure, a stated monitoring period, and several MRV parameters, and the low extraction confidence on source documents limits assurance. Five material findings at validation were all resolved, but the overall evidentiary picture remains thin for a project in its mid-crediting period.

Red Flags

  • No verified ERR figure or monitoring period is stated in the available documents, making it impossible to confirm delivery against the 90,540 tCO2e lifetime claim
  • Low extraction confidence on at least one key document, reducing reliability of the extracted record
  • Five material findings (CARs) at validation, including an incorrect methodology version (18.1 vs 19.0) and missing operational-lifetime evidence, though all were resolved
  • Contradiction between the PDD (combined additionality test) and the validation report (investment test) on the same date

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2012
121,2070121,207
2013
81,115081,115
2014
77,801077,801
2015
79,425079,425
2020
219,7870219,787
Total579,3350579,335

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

Avoidance project, no reversal risk

Leakage

0% deemed negligible, appropriate for wind

Baseline

Jurisdictional, reassessed 2019

Safeguards

Mentioned but FPIC and grievance mechanism not documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25ACM0002
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents →