CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
Re-assessment pendingCDMBiomass EnergyIndiaRegistry: RegisteredAMS-I.C

6 MW Biomass residue based cogeneration unit by MPML at Village Heti (Surla), District Nagpur in Maharashtra, India

Developer: Malu Paper Mills Limited

CDM-1568 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#184of 875 in Biomass#982of 2796 in India#1825of 5733 in CDM (UNFCCC)#34of 275 in AMS-I.C

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 25 Aug 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.5 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Scored2026-08-25medium confidenceLatest monitoring period ends: 2018-04-04

evidence:14/14registry documents analyzed · 4red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

A CDM biomass cogeneration project with VVB-confirmed additionality and a quantified leakage treatment, but with a project-specific baseline, no stated permanence mechanism, and several key monitoring data points (verified ERR, grid emission factor, usage rates) absent from the available documents. Eight corrective actions were raised during validation and subsequently resolved, indicating initial documentation gaps that were remediated.

Red Flags

4 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 4 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 14 registry documents (14 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

Transactions in the CDM registry are discontinued as of 31 December 2026 (UNFCCC, checked 6 October 2026). This page keeps the project's record and our analysis.

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish CORSIA eligibility per project.

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2011
30,607030,607
2012
36,068036,068
2013
105,2370105,237
2014
59,367059,367
2015
75,067075,067
2017
46,606046,606
2018
34,602034,602
2022
107,9830107,983
Total495,5370495,537

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2008–2009AMS-I.C v9.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2009–2010AMS-I.C v9.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2010–2012AMS-I.Cversion not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report

  4. 2012–2013AMS-I.C v9.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2013–2014AMS-I.Cversion not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report

  6. 2014–2015AMS-I.Cversion not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report

  7. 2015–2016AMS-I.Cversion not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report

  8. 2016–2018AMS-I.Cversion not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report

  • AMS-I.C: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAMS-I.C.
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →