Skip to main content
CDMEE own generationSouth AfricaAMS-III.Q

ACP Thermal Harvesting™ Project

CDM-10373 ↗

This rating is archived — the project is no longer listed or its registry data has changed. This is the last published analysis (2026-08-25).
3.2/ 10
Integrity
3.5
Transparency
3.0
Claim Safety
3.0
Documentation
3.0

Audit Analysis

The ACP Thermal Harvesting Project (CDM-10373) is an energy-efficiency project in South Africa validated in December 2017, but the validation report carries 17 material findings and 7 corrective actions, including a flagged lack of clarity in the additionality demonstration. A critical ten-fold discrepancy in the claimed emission reduction figure between the PDD and the validation report, combined with a baseline-method contradiction, raises serious over-crediting concerns. No monitoring-period data, functional no-regret baseline, or usage-rate verification is available in the extracted record.

Red Flags

  • Ten-fold discrepancy in total claimed emissions reductions: the PDD states 152,790 tCO₂e while the validation report states 15,279 tCO₂e — a factor-of-10 error that cannot be resolved without the original calculation sheets
  • Baseline method contradicts between documents: the PDD describes a jurisdictional baseline while the validation report records a project-specific baseline, undermining confidence in the reference-case construction
  • Seventeen material findings and seven corrective actions in the validation report, including a specific finding that the additionality demonstration was 'not clear/transparent' (CAR 06)
  • No monitoring-period verification data, functional no-regret baseline value, or usage-rate verification is present in the available record
  • Minimum extraction confidence is rated low, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable or incomplete

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-verified but flagged as unclear

Permanence

No buffer pool or reversal data

Leakage

0% deemed negligible, thin justification

Baseline

Project-specific, method contradicts PDD

Safeguards

Mentioned but FPIC and grievance not documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25AMS-III.Q

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents