Anew - Arkansas River Basin Forestry Project
#66of 69 in REDD+#110of 115 in United States#45of 45 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)
Audit Analysis
The project record lacks foundational carbon credit metrics across all quality dimensions, with nearly all critical fields missing from the extracted data. Without verified additionality, baseline methodology, or emission reduction figures, environmental integrity and market compliance cannot be substantiated. Comprehensive verification and monitoring documentation is urgently required before any reliable assessment can be made.
Red Flags
- No additionality test type or third-party verifier confirmation found
- Baseline methodology, buffer pool contributions, and leakage deductions entirely absent
- Neither claimed nor verified emission reduction totals are available for pro-rata comparison
- CORSIA eligibility and CCP approval status undocumented, leaving double-counting risk unverified
- Leakage not addressed in project documentation
- Buffer pool size not disclosed in available documents
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
Not assessed
Unverified buffer pool
No treatment documented
Methodology missing
Not documented
Status unknown
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →