Skip to main content
ACRForest CarbonARKANSAS; MISSISSIPPI; LOUISIANA, USGeneral Methodologyv2.0

Anew - Arkansas River Basin Forestry Project

ACR-861 ↗

#66of 69 in REDD+#110of 115 in United States#45of 45 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)

1.3/ 10
Integrity
0.5
Transparency
1.0
Claim Safety
2.0
Documentation
2.5

Audit Analysis

The project record lacks foundational carbon credit metrics across all quality dimensions, with nearly all critical fields missing from the extracted data. Without verified additionality, baseline methodology, or emission reduction figures, environmental integrity and market compliance cannot be substantiated. Comprehensive verification and monitoring documentation is urgently required before any reliable assessment can be made.

Red Flags

  • No additionality test type or third-party verifier confirmation found
  • Baseline methodology, buffer pool contributions, and leakage deductions entirely absent
  • Neither claimed nor verified emission reduction totals are available for pro-rata comparison
  • CORSIA eligibility and CCP approval status undocumented, leaving double-counting risk unverified
  • Leakage not addressed in project documentation
  • Buffer pool size not disclosed in available documents

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Not assessed

Permanence

Unverified buffer pool

Leakage

No treatment documented

Baseline

Methodology missing

Safeguards

Not documented

Double-claim

Status unknown

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-06General Methodology v2.0

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents