Anew � Spruce Woods Forestry Project
#47of 69 in REDD+#77of 115 in United States#21of 45 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)
Audit Analysis
The project suffers from extensive evidence gaps across all evaluation dimensions, with nearly all critical verification and monitoring fields missing from the available records. Without confirmed additionality testing, baseline parameters, or leakage treatment, confidence in credit quality remains low. Substantive documentation updates are required before meaningful validation can occur.
Red Flags
- Critical verification data including verifier name, additionality test, and baseline method are completely missing
- Only one document of unknown type was used for extraction, severely limiting source coverage
- Leakage treatment and buffer pool contribution percentages are not stated
- CORSIA and carbon credit program eligibility status unstated, leaving double-claiming risk unassessed
- Leakage not addressed in project documentation
- Buffer pool size not disclosed in available documents
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
No additionality assessment found
Buffer pool and reversal risk unaddressed due to missing dat
Leakage treatment not addressed in available documents
Baseline method and reassessment timing not stated
No FPIC, grievance mechanism, or safeguards documentation fo
CORSIA and CCP eligibility status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
