Skip to main content
CDMWindArgentinaAMS-I.D

Antonio Moran Wind Power Plant Project in Patagonia Region, Argentina

CDM-0130 ↗

#317of 770 in Renewable energy#3of 6 in Argentina#83of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#101of 417 in AMS-I.D

5.2/ 10
Integrity
6.0
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
6.0

Audit Analysis

A CDM wind project in Patagonia, Argentina, with a standard investment-test additionality and a jurisdictional grid emission factor baseline. The project delivered only ~14% of its pro-rata ex-ante emission reduction expectation over the monitoring period, raising significant over-crediting concerns. Multiple contradictions between the validation and monitoring reports (leakage justification, baseline method, ERR magnitude) and a set of material findings (though resolved) temper confidence in the project's data integrity.

Red Flags

  • The monitoring report (2013) reports a total ERR of 8,785 tCO₂e over the 4-year monitoring period, while the validation report (2011) ex-ante estimate is 108,899 tCO₂e over the 7-year crediting period; pro-rata expectation for the elapsed period is ~62,228 tCO₂e, meaning the project delivered only ~14% of expectation
  • Leakage justification is contradictory: the validation report (2011) states leakage was 'deemed negligible' while the monitoring report (2013) states it was 'quantified' — both resulting in a 0% deduction, but the methodological basis is inconsistent
  • Baseline method is classified as 'project-specific' in the monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the validation report, creating ambiguity about the baseline construction
  • Five corrective action requests (CARs) and five comments (CLs) were raised during validation, including recalculation of the grid emission factor and correction of PDD tables, indicating initial documentation quality issues

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2007
106,5070106,507
2011
20,464020,464
2013
8,78508,785
Total135,7560135,756

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test present; VVB confirmation not explicitly sta

Permanence

Avoidance project (wind); no reversal events reported

Leakage

0% deduction; justification contradicts between validation a

Baseline

Grid EF 0.4838 (2008); method classification inconsistent ac

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned; benefit sharing described; no FPIC or

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated; dual-channel risk unassess

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25AMS-I.D.

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents