PUR removal Serbia Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

BASNA d.o.o.

PUR-957051 ↗

3.1 / 10

Integrity

3.2

Transparency

3.0

Claim Safety

3.4

Documentation

2.6

Score Breakdown

Integrity

missing Additionality, baseline, leakage, and permanence provisions were not found in the extracted record (verification report dated 2022-01-25).

inferred No material findings or corrective actions were reported, but this is hard to rely on given the limited/low-confidence extraction (verification report dated 2022-01-25).

Transparency

verified The VVB is identified as bio.inspecta AG and the monitoring period is specified as 2020-01-01 to 2021-08-31 (verification report dated 2022-01-25).

missing Total removals claimed and verified were not found in the extracted record, limiting MRV transparency (verification report dated 2022-01-25).

Claim Safety

missing No extracted information on baseline setting, leakage, or usage monitoring, increasing over-crediting/greenwashing risk for biochar removals (verification report dated 2022-01-25).

inferred CORSIA eligibility and CCP status were not found in the extracted record, leaving market-claim and double-claim risk unclear.

Documentation

missing Minimum extraction confidence is low, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable.

missing Evidence documents are not clearly identified (listed as “unknown”) despite three documents being used, reducing auditability.

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The project is assessed under Puro’s Biochar Methodology v2.0, but the extracted record does not include the additionality test type, whether additionality was confirmed by the VVB, the baseline method, or any baseline reassessment timing (verification report dated 2022-01-25). Leakage treatment is also missing: neither a leakage deduction nor a justification was found in the extracted record. Permanence-related provisions are unclear because buffer pool contribution and any reversal events were not found in the extracted record, which is material for a removal credit type.

Transparency

The verification report identifies the VVB as bio.inspecta AG and specifies a monitoring period of 2020-01-01 to 2021-08-31 (verification report dated 2022-01-25). However, the extracted record does not provide total removals claimed or verified, preventing a basic cross-check of issuance quantities against monitoring results. Several MRV-relevant fields (e.g., usage monitoring method and fossil/non-fossil fraction approach) were not found in the extracted record, limiting transparency.

Claim Safety

Because baseline method, leakage treatment, and usage monitoring approach were not found in the extracted record, there is elevated risk that credited removals could be overstated relative to what a third party could independently validate from the available data. CORSIA eligibility and CCP status were not found in the extracted record, so buyers cannot rely on this dataset alone to support higher-integrity claims or to assess potential double-claim exposure. The absence of quantified claimed/verified removals in the extracted record further increases greenwashing risk, as claims cannot be reconciled to verified outcomes.

Documentation

Although three documents were used, the evidence document list is not identifiable (shown as “unknown”), which weakens traceability to specific sources. Minimum extraction confidence is low, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable; this materially reduces confidence that key integrity elements were captured. The verification report is dated 2022-01-25, but the extracted record lacks core quantified outcomes (claimed/verified removals) and key methodological parameters.

Overall

No contradictions were flagged in the extracted record, so there are no cross-document discrepancies to resolve. The main issue is evidence gaps: additionality, baseline, leakage, permanence provisions, and claimed/verified removal totals were not found in the extracted record, and extraction confidence is low. Given the gate rules, the low documentation score would cap transparency post-scoring, and the weak integrity evidence base drives a low overall assessment.

Audit Analysis

This Puro biochar removal project has a named VVB and a defined monitoring period, but key integrity-critical elements (additionality approach, baseline, leakage, permanence/buffer) were not found in the extracted record. With low extraction confidence and limited identifiable source documents, the risk of over-crediting or weak substantiation cannot be ruled out from the available evidence.

Project Description

PUR-957051 — Biomass Removal

Red Flags

Additionality approach and whether it was confirmed by the VVB were not found in the extracted record.
Baseline method and any baseline reassessment timing were not found in the extracted record.
Leakage treatment (deduction and justification) was not found in the extracted record.
Permanence provisions (buffer pool and any reversal reporting) were not found in the extracted record.
Low extraction confidence and evidence documents listed as “unknown” reduce confidence in the completeness of the record.

Credit Vintages Exhausted

		Issued	Retired	Available
2022		508	508	0
Total		508	508	0

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

Provide the specific additionality assessment used (and the VVB’s conclusion) and the baseline approach from the PDD/verification report, with clear citations and dates.
Disclose quantified monitoring outcomes (total removals claimed and verified), leakage deduction and justification, and permanence provisions (buffer pool and reversal monitoring) in publicly accessible documentation.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.