American BioCarbon CT, LLC
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified The verification report (2025-06-11) reports no material findings.
missing Core integrity elements (additionality approach, baseline method, leakage treatment, buffer/reversal provisions) were not found in the extracted record, and the verification report (2025-06-11) required multiple calculation corrections.
Transparency
verified The verification report (2025-06-11) identifies the VVB as EnergyLink Services Pty Ltd and provides a defined monitoring period (2023-04-08 to 2024-04-30).
missing Claimed vs verified removals were not found in the extracted record, and low extraction confidence limits transparency into MRV details.
Claim Safety
verified The project is under Puro's Biochar Methodology (Edition 2022 v3), which is at least a defined accounting framework.
missing Over-crediting risk is elevated because verified removal totals were not found in the extracted record and the verification report (2025-06-11) lists multiple corrections to emissions and calculation inputs.
Documentation
verified Eight documents were used in extraction and a recent verification report is available (2025-06-11).
missing Minimum extraction confidence is low and the evidence document list is not specific (listed as "unknown"), reducing auditability.
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The project is assessed under Puro's Biochar Methodology (Edition 2022 v3), but the extracted record does not show what additionality test was applied or whether the VVB confirmed additionality. The baseline method and any baseline reassessment timing were also not found in the extracted record, limiting confidence that credited removals are incremental. While the verification report (2025-06-11) reports no material findings, it required several corrective actions to fix calculation and input errors (electricity, soil temperature, transport, and CORC data entry), which weakens confidence in quantification robustness.
Transparency
A named VVB (EnergyLink Services Pty Ltd) and a clear monitoring period (2023-04-08 to 2024-04-30) are provided in the verification report (2025-06-11). However, the extracted record does not include claimed or verified total removals, nor key MRV parameters (for example, usage monitoring method or fossil/non-renewable biomass approach). Low extraction confidence suggests some underlying documentation may not have been reliably readable, reducing transparency into the underlying calculations and checks.
Claim Safety
Claim safety is constrained by missing eligibility/status signals: CORSIA eligibility and CCP status were not found in the extracted record, so buyers cannot easily gauge alignment with higher-integrity labels. The verification report (2025-06-11) indicates multiple corrections to emissions and calculation inputs, which increases perceived over-crediting/greenwashing risk if public claims are made without clearly disclosing these adjustments. Missing leakage treatment and baseline details in the extracted record further increase uncertainty around net climate benefit claims.
Documentation
Documentation is mixed: there is a recent verification report (2025-06-11) and the extraction used eight documents, which is a positive sign of coverage. But the minimum extraction confidence is low and the evidence document list is not specific ("unknown"), making it hard to trace key assertions back to source pages. The presence of multiple corrective actions in the verification report (2025-06-11) also suggests the documentation and data systems required remediation during assurance.
Overall
No contradictions were identified in the extracted record, so there is no need to privilege one document value over another. The overall score is mainly limited by evidence gaps on additionality, baseline, leakage, and permanence/buffer provisions, combined with multiple calculation-related corrective actions in the verification report (2025-06-11). If documentation were clearer and key accounting elements were explicitly disclosed, both integrity and claim safety would improve. Note: if documentation were scored below 3.0, transparency would be capped by the gate rule (applied after scoring).
Audit Analysis
This Puro biochar removal project has some positive integrity signals (a named VVB and no material findings reported), but key quality-critical elements like additionality approach, baseline method, leakage treatment, and reversal/buffer provisions were not found in the extracted record. Multiple corrective actions related to calculation errors reduce confidence in the robustness of quantified results. Low document readability/extraction confidence further limits assurance and increases over-crediting risk.
Project Description
American BioCarbon (ABC) is a leading manufacturer of the next great advancement in carbon technologies: biochar. ABC uses an agricultural waste product in a unique way to eliminate legacy environmental impacts while helping customers meet environmental, social, and governance goals. American BioCarbon uses patented biomass separation technology along with other specialized equipment to make premium biochar from sugar cane bagasse. By harnessing the unique properties of bagasse, an agricultural waste product that would otherwise be burned or left to decay and create greenhouse gases (GHG), ABC produces a valuable product and helps sugar mills and local sugar growers. It’s a prime demonstration of value creation in a circular economy, a system where materials never become waste and nature is regenerated. The unique honeycomb carbon structure of bagasse makes it more effective than other wood-based products on the market. The porous elements within bagasse make it superior for use as a soil amendment. A highly advantageous attribute of bagasse is carbon sequestration. American BioCarbon’s bagasse biochar permanently captures carbon in the soil, presenting a tremendous opportunity to advance multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDG): SDG Goal 13: Climate Action – Take Urgent Action to Combat Climate Change and its Impacts ABC’s source material, bagasse, is a waste product that is normally burned – creating significant air emissions. ABC removes this source of GHG from the atmosphere by beneficially using bagasse and reduces particulate pollution in largely low-income areas. Emissions from the transportation of raw materials are eradicated by our sugar cane plant co-location strategy. When incorporated into soils, biochar is up to 100 times more stable than the feedstock from which it was produced, and a substantial amount of biochar’s organic carbon will persist in soil for decades to millennia. ABC operates a net-negative process resulting in premiu
Red Flags
- Additionality test and whether the VVB confirmed additionality were not found in the extracted record.
- Baseline method and any baseline reassessment timing were not found in the extracted record.
- Leakage deduction and justification were not found in the extracted record.
- Several corrective actions were required to fix calculation/input errors (electricity, soil temperature, transport, CORC data entry), increasing quantification risk.
- Low extraction confidence indicates at least one key document was poorly readable, weakening documentation reliability.
Credit Vintages Exhausted
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 632 | 632 | 0 | |
| 2024 | 606 | 606 | 0 | |
| Total | 1,238 | 1,238 | 0 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Publish or clearly extract the additionality assessment (test type and explicit VVB conclusion) and the baseline approach used under the Puro biochar methodology.
- Disclose quantified leakage treatment (deduction and justification), permanence provisions (buffer or other reversal management), and the final verified net removals for the monitoring period, with traceable references to the verification report.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
Additionality test not found
Buffer/reversal provisions not found
Leakage treatment not found
Baseline method not found
Safeguards mentioned, details missing
CORSIA/CCP status not found
Where to buy
Marketplaces
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →