Skip to main content
CDMMethane avoidanceIndonesiaAMS-III.H

Biogas project, BAJ Unit 6

CDM-2631 ↗

#81of 111 in Biogas#14of 17 in Indonesia#178of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#16of 22 in AMS-III.H

4.3/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
3.0
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
3.5

Audit Analysis

This CDM biogas project in Indonesia uses a standardized methodology (AMS-III.H / AMS-I.F) and passed validation by JQA with only minor clarifications, but the available record is limited to the validation report and PDD with no monitoring or verification data. The project-specific modeled baseline, absence of a buffer pool, and a 0% leakage deduction justified only as 'deemed negligible' leave meaningful gaps in permanence and leakage treatment. A significant discrepancy in claimed ERR figures (41,860 vs 293,020 tCO₂e) across documents further undermines confidence in the credit volume.

Red Flags

  • ERR contradiction: the validation report (2016-10-28) states 41,860 tCO₂e while an unidentified document references 293,020 tCO₂e — a 7× discrepancy that cannot be reconciled from available records
  • No buffer pool or permanence mechanism is stated in any available document for a project whose crediting period ended in September 2023
  • Leakage deduction of 0% is justified solely as 'deemed negligible' in the PDD, with no quantified assessment for a biogas project where uncontrolled methane release is a realistic risk
  • No monitoring report, verification report, or verified ERR figure is present in the extracted record, making it impossible to confirm actual delivery against the claimed 41,860 tCO₂e

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2012
32,335032,335
2013
13,413013,413
2015
37,314037,314
2016
34,262034,262
Total117,3240117,324

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test present; VVB confirmation not explicitly rec

Permanence

No buffer pool stated; no reversal events but no permanence

Leakage

0% deduction justified only as 'deemed negligible'; no quant

Baseline

Project-specific modeled baseline; last reassessed at projec

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP eligibility both unstated; dual-channel risk

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-26AMS-III.H, AMS-I.F

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents