Biogas project, BAJ Way Jepara
#47of 111 in Biogas#9of 17 in Indonesia#122of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#8of 22 in AMS-III.H
Audit Analysis
A CDM biogas project in Indonesia validated by JQA with a combined additionality test and seven minor clarifications (no corrective actions). The project lacks a buffer pool, verified monitoring data, and a stated FNRB, and the only dated document is the 2016 validation report. The ERR discrepancy between documents (51,471 vs 360,297) is arithmetically consistent with a 7-period lifetime total, but the source of the higher figure is unidentifiable.
Red Flags
- No buffer pool or permanence mechanism identified for a biogas project with inherent operational-failure risk
- No verified ERR or monitoring data found in the extracted record; total_err_verified is absent
- The higher ERR figure (360,297) originates from an 'unknown' document with no date or title, undermining traceability
- FNRB value and method are not stated in any available document, leaving the renewable-energy baseline unquantified
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 57,143 | 0 | 57,143 | |
| 2013 | 67,794 | 0 | 67,794 | |
| 2015 | 53,015 | 0 | 53,015 | |
| 2016 | 33,844 | 0 | 33,844 | |
| Total | 211,796 | 0 | 211,796 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test by JQA; 7 clarifications, no corrective action
No buffer pool; no reversal events reported but risk unaddre
0% deduction, deemed negligible – reasonable for on-site bio
Project-specific, modeled; last reassessed 2016; 2014 grid E
Safeguards and benefit-sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance
CORSIA and CCP status not stated; CDM registry limits but do
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
