Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyMalaysiaAMS-I.C

Biomass Energy Plant-Lumut.

CDM-0249 ↗

#76of 196 in Biomass#158of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#22of 42 in AMS-I.C

4.6/ 10
Integrity
4.8
Transparency
4.2
Claim Safety
4.8
Documentation
4.2

Audit Analysis

The Biomass Energy Plant-Lumut (CDM-0249) is a CDM biomass energy project in Malaysia using the AMS-I.C. methodology, verified by DNV. The project has a combined additionality test and a project-specific baseline reassessed in 2012, but the verification record contains ten material findings, six required corrective actions, and three cross-document contradictions that undermine confidence in the underlying data. Key transparency gaps include the absence of a verified ERR figure, no stated FNRB, and no described usage monitoring method.

Red Flags

  • Ten material findings in the verification record, including missing applicability criteria in the PDD, inconsistent ex-ante emissions calculations, and a required-but-absent biomass availability study
  • Leakage justification is contradictory: the monitoring report (Jan 2013) states 'quantified' while the validation report (Nov 2012) states 'deemed negligible', yet the deduction is 0% in both cases
  • Total ERR figures conflict within monitoring reports (14,329 vs 105,532), creating ambiguity about whether the project is over- or under-delivering relative to its ex-ante estimate
  • FPIC was not conducted and no grievance mechanism is documented, despite safeguards being mentioned in the project documents
  • Grid emission factor of 0.716 tCO2/MWh is based on 2009 data, which is dated relative to the 2012 monitoring period

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2006
20,700020,700
2008
21,845021,845
2010
53,694053,694
2011
20,381020,381
2012
22,491022,491
2013
14,324014,324
Total153,4350153,435

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test present, VVB confirmation not stated

Permanence

No buffer pool stated, no reversal events recorded

Leakage

0% deduction with contradictory justifications across docume

Baseline

Project-specific baseline, reassessed 2012, grid EF from 200

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned but FPIC not conducted, no grievance me

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-26AMS-I.C.

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents