⚠
This rating is archived — the project is no longer listed or its registry
data has changed. This is the last published analysis (2026-04-23).
5.4/ 10
Integrity
6.0
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
6.5
Score Breakdown
integrity
transparency
claim_safety
documentation
Detailed Analysis
▼
Integrity
Transparency
Claim Safety
Documentation
Overall
Audit Analysis
Moderate integrity and documentation: the project has a VVB-reviewed additionality test, FPIC and grievance processes, and a 12% buffer. However, gaps and contradictions on leakage and reversal treatment, missing baseline reassessment and many null MRV fields raise concern about potential over‑crediting and data reliability.
Project Description
Red Flags
⚠Conflicting statements about leakage: monitoring report says leakage not addressed while validation report says it was quantified
⚠Leakage deduction percentage and emission reduction claim figures are not provided in available documents
⚠Reversal treatment is inconsistently reported (none reported vs not addressed)
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
What would improve this score
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
