Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticUgandaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS5658 VPA 37: “Access to energy for local development and resilience building in Uganda”

GS-3032 ↗ · current registry ID: GS11044

#712of 1329 in Industrial#88of 163 in Uganda#1064of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.8/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

A Gold Standard cooking-stove programme in Uganda with VVB-confirmed additionality and a reasonable national-default fNRB, but undermined by 15 material findings (including calculation errors and a crediting-period mismatch), contradictory leakage justifications across documents, and the absence of any documented buffer pool or permanence mechanism. The ERR figures across monitoring reports are inconsistent, making it difficult to confirm whether the project is over- or under-delivering relative to its ex-ante estimate.

Red Flags

  • Three corrective-action requests (CARs) in the verification report include vintage-break calculation errors and a crediting-period mismatch between the monitoring report and the VPA-DD/SC application
  • Leakage justification is contradictory: the PDD (2021) states 'deemed negligible' while the monitoring report (2023) states 'quantified', yet the deduction is 0% in both cases
  • Two monitoring reports report materially different claimed ERR values (3,690 tCO2e in 2023 vs 24,656 tCO2e in 2020), and the verified figure of 24,656 tCO2e cannot be clearly reconciled with the ex-ante lifetime estimate of 37,697 tCO2e over five years
  • No buffer pool, permanence mechanism, or reversal-risk mitigation is documented for this avoidance-type project
  • Grievance mechanism status is contradictory: the PDD (2020) records it as absent while the verification report (2024) confirms its presence

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2022
1,3901,3900
2023
8,1412,3005,841
2024
1,19101,191
Total10,7223,6907,032

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed by SustainCERT

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction with contradictory justification across docs

Baseline

Project-specific, no reassessment date stated

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism confirmed in VR but contradicted in PDD; FPIC not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-04General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents