Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Score withdrawn — under reviewGSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticBangladeshRegistry: RegisteredAMS-II.G

Improved Cooking Stoves in Bangladesh – CPA No.18 “SZ Consultancy Services Ltd.”

Developer: Bangladesh Bondhu Foundation

GS-2940 ↗ · current registry ID: GS10981

Assessment

Re-analysis queued

The latest analysis of this project has been withdrawn for review, so no score is shown. A rating will appear here once the review or the re-analysis completes.

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

29 registry documents and the full project description.

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMAMS-II.G

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Recent label changes on the registry

  • 2026-09-27added: GHG Emissions Reductions
  • 2026-09-27removed: Carbon Dioxide Removals

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2018
23,16823,1680
2019
44,707044,707
2020
43,2332,08641,147
2021
56,802056,802
2022
55,107055,107
2023
1,81001,810
Total224,82725,254199,573

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2017–2020AMS-II.G v3.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2018–2020AMS-II.G v3.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2018–2020AMS-II.G v3.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2020–2021AMS-II.G v3.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2021–2023AMS-II.G v11.1since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. Period not statedAMS-II.G v11.1since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  • AMS-II.G: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAMS-II.G

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →