Integrated Project for Reforestation and Agroforestry on Degraded lands in Nicaragua
#59of 261 in Soil carbon#2of 6 in Nicaragua#536of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#23of 97 in AR-ACM0003
Audit Analysis
A VCS ALM reforestation and agroforestry project in Nicaragua with a VVB-verified barrier additionality test and a substantial 23% buffer pool, but undermined by four material findings (including overestimation of GHG removals from hurricane damage and a sampling-method deviation), a project-specific baseline, and six inter-document contradictions. The project delivered roughly 64% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the elapsed monitoring period, which is conservative, but the low extraction confidence and multiple null fields limit confidence in the overall data picture.
Red Flags
- Four material findings in the verification report, including overestimation of GHG removals for teak areas due to hurricane damage and a deviation in the sampling method for teak-cacao agroforestry systems
- Two corrective actions still required: subtraction of overestimated credits from the previous verification and adjustment of long-term-average calculations for rotation times and planting densities
- Six contradictions across documents, including a discrepancy between the PDD's lifetime ERR estimate (1,171,471 tCO2e) and the monitoring report's figure (65,154 tCO2e), and conflicting descriptions of the additionality test type (barrier vs. combined)
- Minimum extraction confidence rated 'low', indicating at least one key document was poorly readable, reducing reliability of the extracted data
- 39 hectares of project area voluntarily transferred to an indigenous community, reducing the crediting area
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 15,912 | 13,256 | 2,656 | |
| 2021 | 11,509 | 7,819 | 3,690 | |
| 2022 | 13,703 | 1,000 | 12,703 | |
| 2023 | 13,595 | 1,300 | 12,295 | |
| 2024 | 9,063 | 0 | 9,063 | |
| Total | 63,782 | 23,375 | 40,407 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-verified but test type contradicted across documents
23% buffer pool, no reversal events
0% deduction, de minimis justification, minor doc inconsistency
Project-specific, reassessment not yet due
FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented
CCP eligible, CORSIA status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →