Vai al contenuto principale
VCS Agriculture Forestry and Other Land Use India Registry: Registered Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

Mahogany Plantation in India

VCS-2479 ↗

5.9 / 10
Integrity
6.6
Transparency
5.4
Claim Safety
5.8
Documentation
5.2

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified Additionality was confirmed by the VVB, and the project used a barrier test, which supports a real additionality case.

missing Reversal risk is not fully resolved in the extracted record because reversal events are marked as not addressed, even though a 12% buffer pool exists.

Transparency

verified The issuance record identifies the VVB as Carbon Check and provides a clear monitoring period from 2019-06-28 to 2022-10-13.

missing Key MRV details are missing, including the verified and claimed ER totals, leakage deduction percentage, and usage monitoring method.

Claim Safety

verified The project uses a project baseline and the VVB confirmed additionality, which reduces some over-crediting risk.

missing Leakage treatment is not fully visible in the extracted record, and the project is not shown to be CCP-approved or CORSIA-eligible, leaving claim-safety uncertainty.

Documentation

verified Eleven documents were used, the extraction confidence is medium, and the issuance record is relatively recent.

missing The extracted record still lacks several core values, including baseline reassessment timing, verified usage rates, and ERR totals.

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The verification record from Carbon Check confirms additionality through a barrier test, which is a meaningful positive for project integrity. A 12% buffer pool also supports permanence management, and no material findings or corrective actions were reported. That said, reversal events are marked as not addressed, so permanence is not fully closed out in the extracted record.

Transparency

The issuance document provides the registry, VVB name, and monitoring period, which helps traceability. However, the extracted record does not state the claimed or verified emission reductions, the leakage deduction percentage, or the usage monitoring method. Those omissions limit the transparency of the MRV trail.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is helped by the VVB-confirmed additionality and the use of a project baseline, which is better than an unstated or purely default baseline. Still, the record does not provide the actual leakage deduction, and the project is not shown to be CCP-approved or CORSIA-eligible. The contradiction on leakage justification means the evidence is not fully stable across documents.

Documentation

Documentation is moderate because eleven documents were used and the extraction confidence is medium rather than low. The issuance record is fairly recent, but several important fields remain unstated, including baseline reassessment timing, verified usage rates, and ERR totals. The absence of corrective actions is positive, but the record is still incomplete for a high-confidence assessment.

Overall

The project appears moderately credible, with a confirmed additionality test, a buffer pool, and no reported material findings. I privileged the 2023-11-20 issuance record over the earlier 2023-10-27 and 2021-04-15 references because it is the most recent document and appears to be the authoritative issuance source; that is why I treated leakage as quantified and the crediting period as 2019-06-28 to 2049-06-27. However, the contradiction on crediting period and the missing leakage/ERR details reduce reliability and keep the overall score in the middle range.

Audit Analysis

This project has some integrity strengths: additionality was confirmed by the VVB, a buffer pool of 12% is in place, and no material findings were reported. However, the record still has meaningful evidence gaps around leakage treatment details, reversal handling, and crediting-period consistency, which limits confidence in the claim quality. The project looks moderately documented, but not strong enough to be considered low-risk.

Project Description

Proponent: Mahogani Vishwa Agro Pvt Ltd Protocol categories: Agriculture Forestry and Other Land Use Protocols: AR-ACM0003 Estimated annual GHG reductions: 8446 tCO2e Region: Asia Registration date: 2023-11-20

Red Flags

  • The record contains a crediting-period contradiction between two documents, which raises reliability concerns about the project timeline.
  • Leakage is described as quantified in one document, but the actual deduction percentage and supporting details are not stated in the extracted record.

Credit Vintages

Issued Retired Available
2019
41 6 35
2020
1,342 0 1,342
2021
1,338 0 1,338
2022
1,045 0 1,045
Total 3,766 6 3,760

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Publish the full leakage calculation, including the deduction percentage and supporting assumptions, alongside verified and claimed ER totals.
  • Clarify the crediting-period discrepancy and document how reversal risk is monitored and addressed over the full crediting term.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed barrier test

Permanence

Buffer pool present, reversal handling unclear

Leakage

Leakage said to be quantified, but deduction not stated

Baseline

Project baseline, reassessment timing missing

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance mechanism documented

Double-claim

CORSIA/CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-19 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti