Skip to main content
ACRForest CarbonARKANSAS; MISSISSIPPI, USGeneral Methodologyv2.0

Mississippi River Estates IFM Carbon Offset Project, Manulife IM

ACR-1212 ↗

#43of 69 in REDD+#72of 115 in United States#18of 45 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)

2.5/ 10
Integrity
2.0
Transparency
2.5
Claim Safety
3.0
Documentation
3.0

Audit Analysis

The project follows a recognized ACR improved forest management methodology but suffers from severe evidence gaps across all quality dimensions. Critical verification metrics, eligibility statuses, and monitoring data are entirely missing from the available record, preventing meaningful assessment of additionality, leakage treatment, or double-counting risks.

Red Flags

  • Complete absence of independent verifier identity and monitoring period details
  • No quantified emission reductions, baseline methodology, or buffer contribution data available
  • Leakage not addressed in project documentation
  • Buffer pool size not disclosed in available documents

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

No assessment found

Permanence

Buffer/reversal data missing

Leakage

Leakage not addressed

Baseline

Method not stated

Safeguards

None documented

Double-claim

Status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-07General Methodology v2.0

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents