Mordogan Wind Power Project, Turkey

Integrity

The latest issuance record dated 2024-09-12 confirms additionality through an investment test and says the VVB found no material findings or required corrective actions. The project also reports no reversal events, which is favorable for permanence in an avoidance project like wind power. Still, the baseline is project-specific and the record does not state a buffer pool percentage or a baseline reassessment date, so the integrity case is solid but not exceptional.

Transparency

Transparency is helped by the named verifier, the stated monitoring period from 2021-03-01 to 2024-02-29, and the fact that claimed and verified issuance both equal 86,621 in the latest record. However, the usage monitoring method is not found in the extracted documents, and several supporting details are missing or only partially documented. The medium extraction confidence also suggests at least one key source was not fully legible.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is moderate because the project is not CORSIA-eligible and the latest issuance record shows no gap between claimed and verified credits. On the other hand, the baseline remains project-specific, and the contradiction log shows earlier documents with a different credited volume and a quantified leakage treatment, while the latest record says leakage is negligible. I privileged the latest issuance record for issuance and safeguard status because it is the most recent and authoritative document type for the current crediting claim.

Documentation

Documentation quality is fair: sixteen documents were used, the latest issuance record is recent, and the record includes core issuance and verification information. But the extracted record has medium confidence and multiple contradictions across documents, including differences in credited volume, crediting period, and safeguard disclosures. I privileged the 2024-09-12 issuance record over older documents because it is more recent and more specific to the current issuance decision.

Overall

Overall, this project appears credible but not low-risk: the latest issuance record supports additionality, no reversals, and clean verification, while missing baseline and monitoring details keep the score from being stronger. The contradictions must be noted explicitly: I privileged the 2024-09-12 issuance record over earlier documents for leakage treatment, safeguards, credited volume, and crediting period because it is the most recent and issuance-specific source, but the presence of these discrepancies reduces reliability. Under the stated gate rules, documentation is above 3.0 so no transparency cap applies, and integrity is above 4.0 so no overall cap applies.