OYU - Reforesting Uganda for a better tomorrow

Integrity

The verification report (2026-01-26) confirms additionality via a barrier test and lists the VVB (KBS Certification Services Ltd.), which are positive integrity signals. However, the extracted record does not state a project-specific baseline method or the date of the last baseline reassessment; although the methodology cited is AR-ACM0003 (version 2.0), no baseline parameters or buffer pool percentage were provided. Reversal events are listed as not addressed and leakage has only a justification of being 'deemed negligible' with no quantified deduction, which weakens confidence in permanence and leakage controls.

Transparency

There is some transparency: a monitoring period is reported (2021-03-01 — 2024-01-31), a verification report and monitoring report are in the evidence list, and the verification report provides an audited total of 429,924 verified emission reductions. However, key inputs are missing from the extracted records (no baseline emission factor, no total ERR claimed, no usage monitoring method), and the minimum extraction confidence is medium, indicating incomplete public data and gaps in MRV detail.

Claim Safety

Claim risk is elevated. While the VVB confirmed additionality (verification report, 2026), the absence of a documented baseline method and quantified leakage deduction leaves open the possibility of over‑crediting. The project cites AR-ACM0003 methodology, but extracted files lack the baseline parameterisation needed to evaluate conservativeness. Contradictory historical documentation on safeguards and FPIC also increases reputational/greenwashing risk.

Documentation

Documentation coverage is partial: ten documents are indexed and the verification report is recent (2026), which supports recency. The minimum extraction confidence is medium, however, and several essential fields (baseline reassessment, buffer pool percentage, grid EF, claimed ERR) are not found in the extracted record. No material findings or corrective actions were reported in the verification report, but contradictions between documents indicate record inconsistency that reduces documentation reliability.

Overall

The highest-priority document (the 2026 verification report) indicates safeguards, FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing and a barrier test for additionality; these items are used as the privileged values because the verification report is more recent and is the VVB output. However, an earlier monitoring report (2025-05-19) records the opposite for safeguards/FPIC/grievance/benefit-sharing, and an unknown 2023 document reports a different additionality test (investment). These contradictions were weighted down: they reduce confidence and lowered scores, because they indicate inconsistent recordkeeping and possible project changes that are not reconciled in the public documentation. Overall the project scores in the moderate-to-low range (overall 4.0) due to missing baseline/leakage parameters and unresolved contradictions despite a named VVB and a recent verification statement.